MOHAMMED UMAR GAUS MOHAMMED SIDDIQUI vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — BA/4872/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 05th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM010665902025
Filing Number
BA/26292/2025
Filing Date
23-12-2025
Registration No
BA/4872/2025
Registration Date
23-12-2025
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. M. JOSHI
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. M. JOSHI
Bench Type
Single
Category
BAIL ( 51 )
Sub-Category
Regular ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Decision Date
05th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MOHAMMED UMAR GAUS MOHAMMED SIDDIQUI
Adv. Aditya Sharma
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. M. JOSHI
FRESH ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS)
FOR ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS)
FOR ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS)
FOR ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS)
FOR ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS)
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-01-2026 | FRESH ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS) |
| 05-05-2026 | FOR ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS) |
| 27-04-2026 | FOR ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS) |
| 15-04-2026 | FOR ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS) |
| 23-03-2026 | FOR ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS) |
Orders
Summary: The Bombay High Court dismissed the bail application of Mohammed Umar Gaus Mohammed Siddiqui in a case involving recovery of commercial quantities of Codeine Phosphate cough syrup and narcotics from a factory and his motorcycle dickey. The court found prima facie evidence that the applicant had conscious possession of the contraband and held that Section 37 of the NDPS Act applies, which prohibits bail when commercial quantity of drugs is recovered unless strict conditions are met, which were not satisfied here. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Bombay High Court dismissed the bail application of Mohammed Umar Gaus Mohammed Siddiqui in a case involving recovery of commercial quantities of Codeine Phosphate cough syrup and narcotics from a factory and his motorcycle dickey. The court found prima facie evidence that the applicant had conscious possession of the contraband and held that Section 37 of the NDPS Act applies, which prohibits bail when commercial quantity of drugs is recovered unless strict conditions are met, which were not satisfied here. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts