FATIMA AKHTAR HUSSAIN SHAIKH AND ANR vs SHAIKH AZAM MOHAMMAD YUSUF AND ORS Advocate - KHWAJA SHAIKH, ,KHWAJA SHAIKH — WP/119/2026
Case under Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 06th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM010663872025
Filing Number
WP/40717/2025
Filing Date
22-12-2025
Registration No
WP/119/2026
Registration Date
05-01-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDEEP V. MARNE
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDEEP V. MARNE
Bench Type
Single
Category
RENT ACT ( 34 )
Sub-Category
INTERIM ORDER/AD-INTERIM ORDER PASSED IN RENT ACT MATTERS ( 12 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
06th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
FATIMA AKHTAR HUSSAIN SHAIKH AND ANR
Adv. Sumit Kothari
SHAVEZ AKHTER HUSSAIN SHAIKH
Respondent(s)
SHAIKH AZAM MOHAMMAD YUSUF AND ORS Advocate - KHWAJA SHAIKH, ,KHWAJA SHAIKH
SHAIKH ASLAM MOHAMMED YUSUF
SHAIKH AMIR MOHAMMED YUSUF
Adv. KHWAJA SHAIKH
SHABANA NADEEM SHAIKH
SAMEENA JAVED MOMI
AMREEN AZIM SHAIKH
SALEEM ISLAMUDDIN SHAIKH
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDEEP V. MARNE
FRESH ADMISSION
FOR CIRCULATION
FOR ADMISSION
FOR ADMISSION
HIGH ON BOARD (HOB)
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-01-2026 | FRESH ADMISSION |
| 06-05-2026 | FOR CIRCULATION |
| 23-04-2026 | FOR ADMISSION |
| 13-03-2026 | FOR ADMISSION |
| 06-03-2026 | HIGH ON BOARD (HOB) |
Orders
Case Summary: WP/119/2026 The Bombay High Court rejected the petitioners' writ petition challenging the District Judge's order denying amendment of the written statement during appeal. The court found the amendment application was a gross abuse of process, as the defendants failed to provide any explanation for why averments about additional available premises weren't included in the original written statement, despite having raised the issue during trial. The court upheld the rejection, noting the defendants already pleaded availability of alternate premises but failed to substantiate it with evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: WP/119/2026 The Bombay High Court rejected the petitioners' writ petition challenging the District Judge's order denying amendment of the written statement during appeal. The court found the amendment application was a gross abuse of process, as the defendants failed to provide any explanation for why averments about additional available premises weren't included in the original written statement, despite having raised the issue during trial. The court upheld the rejection, noting the defendants already pleaded availability of alternate premises but failed to substantiate it with evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts