RAFIK RUSTOM BALOUCH vs MEHMOOD RUSTOM BALOUCH AND ORS. — IA/112/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 96. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM010662282025
Filing Number
IA/40616/2025
Filing Date
20-Dec-2025
Registration No
IA/112/2026
Registration Date
06-Jan-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh
Coram
Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh
Bench Type
Single
Category
FIRST APPEAL ( 53 )
Sub-Category
Against Order of Civil Court - Single Bench ( 7 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 25-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAFIK RUSTOM BALOUCH
Adv. DEHLVI and CO
Respondent(s)
-
1.MEHMOOD RUSTOM BALOUCH AND ORS.
-
2.RASHID RUSTOM BALOUCH
-
3.REHMAN RUSTOM BALOUCH
-
4.IMTIYAZ RUSTOM BALOUCH
-
5.RAZIA RUSTOM BALOUCH
-
6.NAAZ GULAM RASOOL
Case History
-
10-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
10-Jun-2026
For Orders (Due Matters)
Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh
-
15-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. DeshmukhView PDF
Summary: In Interim Application No. 112 of 2026 before the Bombay High Court, the case was adjourned and stood over to June 10, 2026. Respondent No. 1 appeared personally and sought time as his advocate was unavailable, while other respondents did not appear despite earlier notice. The court noted procedural issues including non-service of the reply affidavit to the opposing side. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Apr-2026
For Orders (Due Matters)
Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh
-
04-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. DeshmukhView PDF
-
04-Mar-2026
For Orders (Due Matters)
Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh
-
02-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. DeshmukhView PDF
-
02-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Jan-2026
Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. DeshmukhView PDF
-
20-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. IA/112/2026
Summary: In Interim Application No. 112 of 2026 before the Bombay High Court, the case was adjourned and stood over to June 10, 2026. Respondent No. 1 appeared personally and sought time as his advocate was unavailable, while other respondents did not appear despite earlier notice. The court noted procedural issues including non-service of the reply affidavit to the opposing side. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts