KISHOR RAMBHAU KALE vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR — IA/4795/2025

Case under Limitation Act Section U/S. Disposed: --Allowed on 09th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM010659392025

Filing Number

IA/26010/2025

Filing Date

19-Dec-2025

Registration No

IA/4795/2025

Registration Date

19-Dec-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice N. R. Borkar

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice N. R. Borkar

Bench Type

Single

Category

CRIMINAL ( 9 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS ( 99 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Decision Date

09-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

--Allowed

Last updated 13-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Limitation Act Section U/S

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KISHOR RAMBHAU KALE

    Adv. RAJESH WAGHMARE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

  2. 2.XYZ (Complainant)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. R. BorkarView PDF

    The Bombay High Court condoned a 65-day delay in filing an appeal by Kishor R. Kale against the Additional Sessions Judge's July 4, 2025 order rejecting his bail application in Special Case No. 531 of 2025. The court accepted the reasons provided for the delay and allowed the appeal to proceed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. JoshiView PDF

  4. 08-Apr-2026

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. Joshi

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. JoshiView PDF

  6. 12-Feb-2026

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. Joshi

  7. 21-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. JoshiView PDF

  8. 21-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 06-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. JoshiView PDF

  10. 19-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. IA/4795/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court condoned a 65-day delay in filing an appeal by Kishor R. Kale against the Additional Sessions Judge's July 4, 2025 order rejecting his bail application in Special Case No. 531 of 2025. The court accepted the reasons provided for the delay and allowed the appeal to proceed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case