RAHUUL RAMESH SHAH AND ANR. AAYUSHYA GERUJA vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS. — HCBM10655952025

Case under Constitution of India Section 226,227. Next hearing: 27th April 2026.

Next hearing 27-Apr-2026

CNR: HCBM010655952025

Filing Number

WP/25844/2025

Filing Date

18-Dec-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. Jamadar

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. Jamadar

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Last updated 19-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226,227
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528
Mah. Protection of Interests of Depositors Section 3,4
Indian Penal Code (I.p.c) Section 420,34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAHUUL RAMESH SHAH AND ANR. AAYUSHYA GERUJA

  2. 2.RAMESH SUMIRMAL SHAH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

  2. 2.KIRAN KUMAR DEVERLA

  3. 3.SRIKANTH KONGARA

    Adv. Divya Shah Associates

  4. 4.AMRUTHA CHALASANI

  5. 5.RANGANATHAN RAJAGOPALAN

    Adv. Divya Shah Associates

  6. 6.JANAKI RANGANATHAN

    Adv. Divya Shah Associates

  7. 7.KARAN PANWAR

  8. 8.NIDHI PAWAR

  9. 9.PARTHASARTHY SRINIVASA COMMANDUR

    Adv. Divya Shah Associates

  10. 10.AKILA VENKATRAMAN

    Adv. Divya Shah Associates

  11. 11.NARESH SURESH PAI

    Adv. Divya Shah Associates

  12. 12.VIDYA RAI

    Adv. Divya Shah Associates

  13. 13.GUDIMETLA RAMANARASIMHAM

  14. 14.PALLAVI GUDIMETLA

  15. 15.PUSHKAR VISHWAMBHAR DESHMUKH

  16. 16.POOJA PUSHKAR DESHMUKH

  17. 17.RAJIV KUMAR BABULAL PATEL

    Adv. Divya Shah Associates,Divya Shah Associates

  18. 18.HEMANTIKABEN RAJIVKUMAR PATEL

  19. 19.VENTATESH SRINIVASAN

    Adv. Divya Shah Associates,Divya Shah Associates

  20. 20.PAVITHRA VENKATESH

    Adv. Divya Shah Associates,Divya Shah Associates

  21. 21.VENKATA MANDAPATI

    Adv. Divya Shah Associates

  22. 22.MOUNICA DANTAULURI

  23. 23.BHUVANESHWARAM KESAVAN

    Adv. Divya Shah Associates

  24. 24.SRIDHARAN PAVITHRA

  25. 25.ROHITH SHETTY

    Adv. Divya Shah Associates

  26. 26.GEETA SHETTY

  27. 27.SRIKANTH RAGHAVAN SRINIVASAN IYENGAR

    Adv. Divya Shah Associates

  28. 28.SUCHETA SRIKANTH IYENGAR

  29. 29.KAILASH SRIVATSA

    Adv. Divya Shah Associates

  30. 30.MEERA SRIVASTA

    Adv. Divya Shah Associates

  31. 31.MAHESH YESHWANT PARTE

    Adv. Divya Shah Associates

  32. 32.RUPALI CHANDRAKANT WLKE

    Adv. Divya Shah Associates

  33. 33.GOPINATHAN PRAVEEN KUMAR

  34. 34.M/S METRO INVESTMENTS, THROUGH ITS PARTNER MAHESH VALIRAM MIRANI

    Adv. SHAISTA HADI

  35. 35.ASIM ZAHIR KHOT

  36. 36.FOUQIA ASIM KHOT

  37. 37.MUFFADAL QUSAY KOTHARI

    Adv. ANB LEGAL

Case History

  1. 27-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 27-Apr-2026

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. Jamadar

  3. 18-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. JamadarView PDF

    Summary: The High Court of Judicature at Bombay allowed HDFC Bank Ltd.'s intervention application in the writ petition filed by Rahuul Ramesh Shah and others against the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner was ordered to implead HDFC Bank as a party respondent with necessary amendments carried out immediately. The case was adjourned to 27th April 2026, with previously granted ad-interim relief continuing until the next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 17-Apr-2026

    High On Board (Hob)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. Jamadar

  5. 06-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. JamadarView PDF

  6. 06-Apr-2026

    Fresh Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. Jamadar

  7. 26-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. JamadarView PDF

  8. 07-Jan-2026

    At 3.00 P.M.

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. Jamadar

  9. 22-Dec-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. JamadarView PDF

  10. 19-Dec-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. JamadarView PDF

  11. 19-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  12. 18-Dec-2025

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Judicature at Bombay allowed HDFC Bank Ltd.'s intervention application in the writ petition filed by Rahuul Ramesh Shah and others against the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner was ordered to implead HDFC Bank as a party respondent with necessary amendments carried out immediately. The case was adjourned to 27th April 2026, with previously granted ad-interim relief continuing until the next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case