MOHINI RAJKUMAR SETH SANJAY UDESHI AND CO vs MOHIT ATUL KOTHARE — CP/58/2026

Case under Contempt of Court Act 1971 Section 12. Next hearing: : -.

CNR: HCBM010655232025

Next Hearing

: -

e-Filing Number

16-12-2025

Filing Number

CP/40243/2025

Filing Date

17-12-2025

Registration No

CP/58/2026

Registration Date

28-01-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE JITENDRA SHANTILAL JAIN

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE JITENDRA SHANTILAL JAIN

Bench Type

Single

Category

CONTEMPT OF COURT ( 8 )

Sub-Category

CIVIL CONTEMPT ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Acts & Sections

Contempt of Court Act 1971 Section 12

Petitioner(s)

MOHINI RAJKUMAR SETH SANJAY UDESHI AND CO

Respondent(s)

MOHIT ATUL KOTHARE

ATUL RAMRAO KOTHARE

TEJ PRADIP DALAL

KISAN VASANT PRADHAN

MADHURI UDAY KIRTIKAR

AJIT INDRASEN NAVALKAR

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE JITENDRA SHANTILAL JAIN

04-02-2026

FOR CIRCULATION

17-04-2026

FIRST ON BOARD -

30-03-2026

FOR ADMISSION

09-03-2026

FOR CIRCULATION

Orders

23-04-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE JITENDRA SHANTILAL JAIN

In Contempt Petition No. 58 of 2026 (arising from First Appeal No. 559 of 2020), the Bombay High Court accepted a corrected No Objection Certificate (NOC) into the record, marking it as "X" for identification. The earlier copy containing handwritten corrections was returned to the parties. This appears to be a procedural order addressing documentary compliance in the appellate matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

In Contempt Petition No. 58 of 2026 (arising from First Appeal No. 559 of 2020), the Bombay High Court accepted a corrected No Objection Certificate (NOC) into the record, marking it as "X" for identification. The earlier copy containing handwritten corrections was returned to the parties. This appears to be a procedural order addressing documentary compliance in the appellate matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case