MOHINI RAJKUMAR SETH SANJAY UDESHI AND CO vs MOHIT ATUL KOTHARE — CP/58/2026
Case under Contempt of Court Act 1971 Section 12. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: HCBM010655232025
e-Filing Number
16-12-2025
Filing Number
CP/40243/2025
Filing Date
17-Dec-2025
Registration No
CP/58/2026
Registration Date
28-Jan-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain
Bench Type
Single
Category
CONTEMPT OF COURT ( 8 )
Sub-Category
CIVIL CONTEMPT ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 27-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MOHINI RAJKUMAR SETH SANJAY UDESHI AND CO
Respondent(s)
-
1.MOHIT ATUL KOTHARE
-
2.ATUL RAMRAO KOTHARE
-
3.TEJ PRADIP DALAL
-
4.KISAN VASANT PRADHAN
-
5.MADHURI UDAY KIRTIKAR
-
6.AJIT INDRASEN NAVALKAR
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
23-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal JainView PDF
In Contempt Petition No. 58 of 2026 (arising from First Appeal No. 559 of 2020), the Bombay High Court accepted a corrected No Objection Certificate (NOC) into the record, marking it as "X" for identification. The earlier copy containing handwritten corrections was returned to the parties. This appears to be a procedural order addressing documentary compliance in the appellate matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal JainView PDF
-
17-Apr-2026
First On Board -
Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain
-
30-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal JainView PDF
-
30-Mar-2026
For Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain
-
09-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal JainView PDF
-
09-Mar-2026
For Circulation
Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain
-
04-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal JainView PDF
-
04-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. CP/58/2026
In Contempt Petition No. 58 of 2026 (arising from First Appeal No. 559 of 2020), the Bombay High Court accepted a corrected No Objection Certificate (NOC) into the record, marking it as "X" for identification. The earlier copy containing handwritten corrections was returned to the parties. This appears to be a procedural order addressing documentary compliance in the appellate matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts