M/S KANCHAN MOTORS HUF THROU. NISHANT PRAKASHCHANDRA BHUTADA AND ORS vs INDIAN BANK — IA/38660/2025
Case under C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 24th December 2025.
CNR: HCBM010655222025
Filing Number
IA/40242/2025
Filing Date
17-Dec-2025
Registration No
IA/38660/2025
Registration Date
19-Dec-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla , Hon'ble Shri Justice Farhan Parvez Dubash
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla , Hon'ble Shri Justice Farhan Parvez Dubash
Bench Type
Division
Category
ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS ( 99 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
24-Dec-2025
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 13-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.M/S KANCHAN MOTORS HUF THROU. NISHANT PRAKASHCHANDRA BHUTADA AND ORS
Adv. Jainish Jain
Respondent(s)
-
1.INDIAN BANK
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale,hon'ble Shri Justice Farhan Parvez DubashView PDF
The Bombay High Court granted a four-week extension to the Debt Recovery Tribunal, Mumbai to dispose of pending Securitization Applications (Nos. 397 and 426 of 2024) filed by Kanchan Motors HUF against Indian Bank, citing the tribunal's workload constraints. The court made it clear that no further extensions would be granted beyond this deadline. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale,hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak ShirsatView PDF
-
24-Dec-2025
For Circulation
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla , Hon'ble Shri Justice Farhan Parvez Dubash
-
23-Dec-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla,hon'ble Shri Justice Farhan Parvez DubashView PDF
-
23-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. IA/38660/2025
The Bombay High Court granted a four-week extension to the Debt Recovery Tribunal, Mumbai to dispose of pending Securitization Applications (Nos. 397 and 426 of 2024) filed by Kanchan Motors HUF against Indian Bank, citing the tribunal's workload constraints. The court made it clear that no further extensions would be granted beyond this deadline. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts