KRISHNAKUMAR KARSANDAS ASHAR vs ASHA NABAR AND ORS Advocate - R S MIRPURY — WP/17397/2025
Case under Mah. Ownership Flats Act Section NA. Disposed: --Disposed Off on 27th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM010652962025
Filing Number
WP/40102/2025
Filing Date
17-12-2025
Registration No
WP/17397/2025
Registration Date
19-12-2025
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMIT BORKAR
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMIT BORKAR
Bench Type
Division
Category
TOWN PLANNING ( 39 )
Sub-Category
TOWN PLANNING MATTERS INCLUDING MATTERS RELATING TO RESERVATION,TOWN PLANNING SCHEMES ( 4 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
27th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
--Disposed Off
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
KRISHNAKUMAR KARSANDAS ASHAR
Adv. Shyamrishi pathak
Respondent(s)
ASHA NABAR AND ORS Advocate - R S MIRPURY
JAGRUTI CO-OP. HOS. SOC. LTD.
Adv. R S MIRPURY
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA (THR DISTRICT DEPUTY REGISTRAR)
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMIT BORKAR
FOR CIRCULATION
FIRST ON BOARD (FOB)
-FOR DIRECTIONS
-DUE ADMISSION
-FOR DIRECTIONS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-12-2025 | FOR CIRCULATION |
| 27-04-2026 | FIRST ON BOARD (FOB) |
| 24-03-2026 | -FOR DIRECTIONS |
| 05-03-2026 | -DUE ADMISSION |
| 17-02-2026 | -FOR DIRECTIONS |
Orders
The Bombay High Court disposed of the writ petition filed by Krishnakumar Karsandas Ashar challenging an appellate authority's order passed under Section 154 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. The court held that an efficacious statutory remedy of revision is available to the petitioner and accordingly dismissed the writ petition, permitting the petitioner to pursue the revision remedy before the Revisional Authority instead. The interim application was also disposed of as a consequence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Bombay High Court disposed of the writ petition filed by Krishnakumar Karsandas Ashar challenging an appellate authority's order passed under Section 154 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. The court held that an efficacious statutory remedy of revision is available to the petitioner and accordingly dismissed the writ petition, permitting the petitioner to pursue the revision remedy before the Revisional Authority instead. The interim application was also disposed of as a consequence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts