JISHAN AHMAD ALAM KHAN vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — BA/4764/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 08th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM010648402025
Filing Number
BA/25548/2025
Filing Date
15-12-2025
Registration No
BA/4764/2025
Registration Date
16-12-2025
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHIVKUMAR DIGE
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHIVKUMAR DIGE
Bench Type
Single
Category
BAIL ( 51 )
Sub-Category
Regular ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Decision Date
08th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
JISHAN AHMAD ALAM KHAN
Adv. Brahmanand Dube,Imran Nasir Shaikh,Imran Nasir Shaikh, ,Imran Nasir Shaikh
Respondent(s)
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHIVKUMAR DIGE
FOR ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS)
FOR ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS)
FOR ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS)
FOR ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS)
FOR ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS)
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-02-2026 | FOR ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS) |
| 08-05-2026 | FOR ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS) |
| 07-05-2026 | FOR ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS) |
| 16-04-2026 | FOR ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS) |
| 01-04-2026 | FOR ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS) |
Orders
Summary of BA/4764/2025 The Bombay High Court granted bail to Jishan Ahmad Alam Khan in a Mephedrone possession case, finding that the police search violated NDPS Act provisions by being conducted by a constable rather than a gazetted officer. The court considered that the applicant had been detained for over 2 years with no trial progress, outweighing flight risk concerns, and released him on Rs. 30,000 personal bond with standard conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of BA/4764/2025 The Bombay High Court granted bail to Jishan Ahmad Alam Khan in a Mephedrone possession case, finding that the police search violated NDPS Act provisions by being conducted by a constable rather than a gazetted officer. The court considered that the applicant had been detained for over 2 years with no trial progress, outweighing flight risk concerns, and released him on Rs. 30,000 personal bond with standard conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts