KAMALJEET SINGH GILL S/O RAGHBIR SINGH GILL AND ORS vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR — APL/1902/2024
Case under Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.pc) Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 07th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM010646422024
Filing Number
APL/26859/2024
Filing Date
26-Dec-2024
Registration No
APL/1902/2024
Registration Date
26-Dec-2024
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe
Bench Type
Division
Category
CRIMINAL ( 9 )
Sub-Category
Quashing FIR, C.R., Charge Sheet - Crime against Women and Children ( 106 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Decision Date
07-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 13-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KAMALJEET SINGH GILL S/O RAGHBIR SINGH GILL AND ORS
Adv. SHRISHAIL SAKHARE
-
2.MR. RAGHBIR SINGH GILL
-
3.MRS. DALJIT SIDHU
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
-
2.MRS. MANJEET KAUR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. BhobeView PDF
The Bombay High Court granted the applicants' request to withdraw Criminal Application No. 1902 of 2024, allowing them to file an amended application with complete details that were inadvertently omitted. The State did not object to the withdrawal. The court also disposed of the related Interim Application No. 4486 of 2025 as no substantive issues remained, while reserving all contentions of the State for future proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Dec-2025
Fresh Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandesh Dadasaheb Patil , Hon'ble Justice Revati Mohite Dere
-
26-Dec-2024
Case filed
Registration No. APL/1902/2024
The Bombay High Court granted the applicants' request to withdraw Criminal Application No. 1902 of 2024, allowing them to file an amended application with complete details that were inadvertently omitted. The State did not object to the withdrawal. The court also disposed of the related Interim Application No. 4486 of 2025 as no substantive issues remained, while reserving all contentions of the State for future proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts