GOPAL ARJUN MAHTO vs HOUSILAPRASAD JAGNU YADAV(DELETED) THR. ITS LRS AND ORS 1. — CRA/8/2025

Case under Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 Section 360. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.

Next hearing 17-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM010646312024

Filing Number

CRA/37760/2024

Filing Date

26-Dec-2024

Registration No

CRA/8/2025

Registration Date

03-Jan-2025

Judge

Dr.M.S. Deshpande, Registrar (Judicial - II)

Coram

Dr.M.S. Deshpande, Registrar (Judicial - II)

Bench Type

Single

Category

RENT ACT ( 34 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS ( 99 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 13-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 Section 360

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOPAL ARJUN MAHTO

    Adv. AA SIDDIQUIE ASSOCIATES

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.HOUSILAPRASAD JAGNU YADAV(DELETED) THR. ITS LRS AND ORS 1.

  2. 2.SMT. BHANUMATI H. YADAV

    Adv. SASIDHARAN E K1.

  3. 3.SHIR. OMPRAKASH H.YADAV1.

  4. 4.SHIR. JAIPRAKASH H.YADAV.1.

  5. 5.SHIR. VEDPRAKASH H. YADAV1.

  6. 6.SHIR. VIJAYPRAKASH H. YADAV1.

  7. 7.SMT. ASHA V. YADAV1.

  8. 8.SMT. SAROJ R. YADAV

  9. 9.SMT. SHIVKUMARI B. YADAV (SINCE DECEASED)(Legal Heir)2.

  10. 10.MR. RAJKUMAR BANSILAL YADAV2.

  11. 11.MR. VINOD BASILAL YADAV

  12. 12.SMT. DIGGUDEVI RAMAVADH YADAV (SINCE DECEASED)(Legal Heir)3.

  13. 13.MR. RAMAVADH CHHOTELAL YADAV3.

  14. 14.MR. DINESH RAMAVADH YADAV3.

  15. 15.MR. ARJUN RAMAVADH YADAV3.

  16. 16.MR RAMSUNDER RAMAVADH YADAV3.

  17. 17.MISS. KUSHBOO RAMAVADH YADAV

  18. 18.SMT. GANPATADEVI RAJENDRAPRASAD YADAV

  19. 19.SMT.SANGEETADEVI KARAMCHAND YADAV

Case History

  1. 17-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 17-Jun-2026

    For Orders (Unserved Notices)

    Dr.M.S. Deshpande, Registrar (Judicial - II)

  3. 06-May-2026

    Dr.M.S. Deshpande, Registrar (Judicial - II)View PDF

    Case Summary: CRA/8/2025 In Civil Revision Application No. 08 of 2025 before the Bombay High Court, the case was adjourned. The court directed the petitioner's advocate to serve notice on unserved Respondent No. 5 and bring on record the legal representatives of deceased Respondent No. 3(a) within two weeks (excluding summer vacation). The court warned that failure to comply would result in dismissal of the application at the next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 16-Dec-2025

    For Orders (Await Service)

    Shri. S.R. Agrawal, Registrar(Judl II)

  5. 16-Dec-2025

    For Orders (Await Service)

    Shri. S.R. Agrawal, Registrar(Judl II)

  6. 02-Dec-2025

    Shri. S.R. Agrawal, Registrar(Judl II)View PDF

  7. 21-Nov-2025

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. Jamdar

  8. 30-Sep-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. JamdarView PDF

  9. 30-Sep-2025

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. Jamadar

  10. 06-Aug-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. JamadarView PDF

  11. 06-Aug-2025

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. Jamadar

  12. 25-Jun-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. JamadarView PDF

  13. 25-Jun-2025

    High On Board (Hob)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. Jamdar

  14. 02-Apr-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. JamdarView PDF

  15. 02-Apr-2025

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. Jamdar

  16. 11-Mar-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. JamdarView PDF

  17. 11-Mar-2025

    At 2.30 P.M.

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. Jamdar

  18. 25-Feb-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. JamdarView PDF

  19. 25-Feb-2025

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. Jamdar

  20. 04-Feb-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. JamdarView PDF

  21. 03-Feb-2025

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. Jamdar

  22. 06-Jan-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. JamdarView PDF

  23. 06-Jan-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  24. 26-Dec-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRA/8/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRA/8/2025 In Civil Revision Application No. 08 of 2025 before the Bombay High Court, the case was adjourned. The court directed the petitioner's advocate to serve notice on unserved Respondent No. 5 and bring on record the legal representatives of deceased Respondent No. 3(a) within two weeks (excluding summer vacation). The court warned that failure to comply would result in dismissal of the application at the next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case