MUMBAI BUS MALAK SANGATHANA (REGISTERED) THROUGH ITS SECRETARY KORAGAPPA VENKAPPA SHETTY vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY (URBAN DEVELOPMENT) AND ANR — HCBM10642312025
Case under Constitution of India. Next hearing: 04th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM010642312025
Filing Number
IA/39481/2025
Filing Date
11-Dec-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Smt. Justice Bharati Dangre , Hon'ble Justice Smt Manjusha Ajay Deshpande
Coram
Hon'ble Smt. Justice Bharati Dangre , Hon'ble Justice Smt Manjusha Ajay Deshpande
Bench Type
Division
Category
ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS ( 99 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 13-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MUMBAI BUS MALAK SANGATHANA (REGISTERED) THROUGH ITS SECRETARY KORAGAPPA VENKAPPA SHETTY
Adv. SUHAS SHIVAJI DEOKAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY (URBAN DEVELOPMENT) AND ANR
Case History
-
04-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
12-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Smt. Justice Bharati Dangre,hon'ble Justice Smt Manjusha Ajay DeshpandeView PDF
The High Court of Bombay disposed of a praecipe (procedural request) filed by Mumbai Bus Malak Sangathana regarding jurisdictional confusion. The court clarified that the underlying writ petition had been converted to the Original Side but was inadvertently decided in Appellate Jurisdiction on 04/05/2026. The court directed that Writ Petition (L) No. 6078 of 2023 be considered under Original Side Civil Jurisdiction and extended the time to remove office objections by four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-May-2026
Hon'ble Smt. Justice Bharati Dangre,hon'ble Justice Smt Manjusha Ajay DeshpandeView PDF
-
30-Apr-2026
For Circulation
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Suman Shyam
-
23-Mar-2026
Hon'ble The Chief Justice,hon'ble Shri Justice Suman ShyamView PDF
-
23-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Dec-2025
Case filed
The High Court of Bombay disposed of a praecipe (procedural request) filed by Mumbai Bus Malak Sangathana regarding jurisdictional confusion. The court clarified that the underlying writ petition had been converted to the Original Side but was inadvertently decided in Appellate Jurisdiction on 04/05/2026. The court directed that Writ Petition (L) No. 6078 of 2023 be considered under Original Side Civil Jurisdiction and extended the time to remove office objections by four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts