REHANA SAGIR KHAN vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — BA/4684/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 07th May 2026.

CNR: HCBM010639752025

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

18th December 2025

Filing Number

BA/25170/2025

Filing Date

10-12-2025

Registration No

BA/4684/2025

Registration Date

11-12-2025

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. M. JOSHI

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. M. JOSHI

Bench Type

Single

Category

BAIL ( 51 )

Sub-Category

Regular ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Decision Date

07th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 96,143(2),143(4)
Protection of Children from Sexual Offence Act 2012 Section 18
Prevention of Illicit Traffic Act (P.i.t.a) Section 4,5

Petitioner(s)

REHANA SAGIR KHAN

Adv. Husen Shaikh

Respondent(s)

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

XYZ

Jyoti Subhash Bhagadi

Ruksana Mehboob Khan

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. M. JOSHI

18-12-2025
07-05-2026

FOR ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS)

24-04-2026

FOR CIRCULATION -1

15-04-2026

FOR ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS)

24-03-2026

FOR CIRCULATION

Orders

07-05-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. M. JOSHI

The Bombay High Court granted bail to Rehana Sagir Khan, accused of inducing a minor into prostitution under the Immoral Traffic Prevention Act and POCSO Act. The court found merit in the applicant's argument that POCSO charges may not apply since the victim did not claim sexual intercourse occurred, and noted the applicant has no criminal history and had been in custody for 11 months. Bail was granted on a PR bond of Rs. 15,000 with conditions prohibiting contact with the victim and requiring trial court attendance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court granted bail to Rehana Sagir Khan, accused of inducing a minor into prostitution under the Immoral Traffic Prevention Act and POCSO Act. The court found merit in the applicant's argument that POCSO charges may not apply since the victim did not claim sexual intercourse occurred, and noted the applicant has no criminal history and had been in custody for 11 months. Bail was granted on a PR bond of Rs. 15,000 with conditions prohibiting contact with the victim and requiring trial court attendance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case