RAJESH LAXMAN BORICHA KARTIK S GARG (APPOINTED ADV THROUGH LEGAL AID) vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — IA/4536/2025
Case under Limitation Act Section U/S. Disposed: --Disposed Off on 06th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM010627632025
Filing Number
IA/24700/2025
Filing Date
04-Dec-2025
Registration No
IA/4536/2025
Registration Date
04-Dec-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. Gadkari , Hon'ble Justice Kamal Khata
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. Gadkari , Hon'ble Justice Kamal Khata
Bench Type
Division
Category
CRIMINAL ( 9 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS ( 99 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Decision Date
06-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
--Disposed Off
Last updated 13-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAJESH LAXMAN BORICHA KARTIK S GARG (APPOINTED ADV THROUGH LEGAL AID)
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. Gadkari,hon'ble Justice Kamal KhataView PDF
Case Summary: IA/4536/2025 The Bombay High Court condoned a 301-day delay in filing a criminal appeal against conviction by Rajesh Laxman Boricha. The applicant, who remained incarcerated since arrest, could not appeal within the statutory period due to lack of legal and financial assistance; he subsequently obtained legal aid representation through the High Court Legal Services Committee before filing the appeal. The court allowed the application for condonation in the interest of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. IA/4536/2025
Case Summary: IA/4536/2025 The Bombay High Court condoned a 301-day delay in filing a criminal appeal against conviction by Rajesh Laxman Boricha. The applicant, who remained incarcerated since arrest, could not appeal within the statutory period due to lack of legal and financial assistance; he subsequently obtained legal aid representation through the High Court Legal Services Committee before filing the appeal. The court allowed the application for condonation in the interest of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts