HIMANSHU PRAVIN KAPADIA AND ORS vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR — APL/1460/2025

Case under Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.pc) Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 19th January 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM010624542025

Filing Number

APL/24523/2025

Filing Date

03-Dec-2025

Registration No

APL/1460/2025

Registration Date

03-Dec-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe

Bench Type

Single

Category

CRIMINAL ( 9 )

Sub-Category

Quashing FIR, C.R., Charge Sheet - Crime against Women and Children ( 106 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Decision Date

19-Jan-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 04-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.pc) Section 482
Indian Penal Code (I.p.c) Section 498-A,406,328,504,506,34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HIMANSHU PRAVIN KAPADIA AND ORS

    Adv. Dharmendra Damani

  2. 2.MR. PRAVIN GOKALDAS KAPADIA

  3. 3.MRS PRITI PRAVIN KAPADIA

  4. 4.MS RAKSHA PRAVIN KAPADIA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

  2. 2.MRS DHARTI HIMANSHU KAPADIA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. BhobeView PDF

    The Bombay High Court corrected a typographical error in its previous order dated 19 January 2026, substituting prayer clause (a) with prayer clause (b) in paragraph 7, with no objection from the State. The corrected order was directed to be uploaded on the official website, and the application for correction was disposed of accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. BhobeView PDF

  4. 10-Dec-2025

    —

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. Jamadar

  5. 03-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. APL/1460/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court corrected a typographical error in its previous order dated 19 January 2026, substituting prayer clause (a) with prayer clause (b) in paragraph 7, with no objection from the State. The corrected order was directed to be uploaded on the official website, and the application for correction was disposed of accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case