VIVEK MANOHAR HALDANKAR AND ORS vs SMITA RAVINDRAKUMAR POWLE AND ORS — IA/438/2026

Case under Mah. Land Revenue Code, 1966 Section 227. Next hearing: 24th March 2026.

CNR: HCBM010621232025

Next Hearing

24th March 2026

Filing Number

IA/38275/2025

Filing Date

01-12-2025

Registration No

IA/438/2026

Registration Date

17-01-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MILIND N. JADHAV

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MILIND N. JADHAV

Bench Type

Single

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS ( 99 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Acts & Sections

Mah. Land Revenue Code, 1966 Section 227

Petitioner(s)

VIVEK MANOHAR HALDANKAR AND ORS

Adv. SWAPNIL NEWASKAR

Respondent(s)

SMITA RAVINDRAKUMAR POWLE AND ORS

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MILIND N. JADHAV

24-03-2026

FOR ADMISSION

09-02-2026

FOR ADMISSION

Orders

09-06-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ARUN R. PEDNEKER

Case Summary: IA/438/2026 Case: Interim Application No. 438 of 2026 in Writ Petition No. 2056 of 2025 Court: High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Civil Appellate Jurisdiction) Parties: Smita Ravindrakumar Powle and Another (Petitioners) v. Vivek Manohar Haldankar and Others (Respondents) Order (9 June 2026): The case was adjourned sine die (indefinitely) pending the full bench decision in *Ravindra Laxman Borole v. State of Maharashtra* (WP 2103/2021), as the issues in both cases are identical. The court granted time for respondents' advocate to file his vakalatnama and permitted mentioning the matter after the full bench decision. Any interim relief previously granted continues. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: IA/438/2026 Case: Interim Application No. 438 of 2026 in Writ Petition No. 2056 of 2025 Court: High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Civil Appellate Jurisdiction) Parties: Smita Ravindrakumar Powle and Another (Petitioners) v. Vivek Manohar Haldankar and Others (Respondents) Order (9 June 2026): The case was adjourned sine die (indefinitely) pending the full bench decision in *Ravindra Laxman Borole v. State of Maharashtra* (WP 2103/2021), as the issues in both cases are identical. The court granted time for respondents' advocate to file his vakalatnama and permitted mentioning the matter after the full bench decision. Any interim relief previously granted continues. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case