NAGESHKUMAR ARJUNRAO SURVASE vs SANGEETA NAGESHKUMAR SURVASE AND ANR Advocate - Vikrant Khare — WP/2290/2026
Case under Hindu Marriage Act. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM010618512025
Filing Number
WP/38139/2025
Filing Date
29-Nov-2025
Registration No
WP/2290/2026
Registration Date
16-Feb-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice N. R. Borkar
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice N. R. Borkar
Bench Type
Single
Category
FAMILY LAW ( 16 )
Sub-Category
MAINTENANCE ( 6 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 02-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.NAGESHKUMAR ARJUNRAO SURVASE
Adv. RANKHAMBE VISHAL VINAYAK
Respondent(s)
-
1.SANGEETA NAGESHKUMAR SURVASE AND ANR Advocate - Vikrant Khare
-
2.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Case History
-
10-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
10-Jun-2026
For Admission /Hearing
Hon'ble Shri Justice N. R. Borkar
-
29-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice N. R. BorkarView PDF
The Bombay High Court adjourned the criminal writ petitions and listed the matter for hearing on 10.06.2026. The Trial Court is directed to adjourn its proceedings after that date, and the respondent is permitted to file a reply with the Registry. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
29-Apr-2026
Due Admission - 1
Hon'ble Shri Justice N. R. Borkar
-
01-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice N. R. BorkarView PDF
-
01-Apr-2026
For Admission /Hearing
Hon'ble Shri Justice N. R. Borkar
-
13-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice N. R. BorkarView PDF
-
13-Mar-2026
For Circulation
Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. Jamdar
-
27-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. JamdarView PDF
-
27-Feb-2026
For Circulation
Hon'ble Shri Justice Madhav J. Jamdar
-
23-Feb-2026
For Orders (Objection Not Removed)
Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)
-
05-Feb-2026
Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)View PDF
-
14-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
29-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. WP/2290/2026
The Bombay High Court adjourned the criminal writ petitions and listed the matter for hearing on 10.06.2026. The Trial Court is directed to adjourn its proceedings after that date, and the respondent is permitted to file a reply with the Registry. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts