VIPUL UMESH SOLANKI vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — BA/4537/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 08th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM010616212025
Next Hearing
05th December 2025
Filing Number
BA/24159/2025
Filing Date
28-11-2025
Registration No
BA/4537/2025
Registration Date
28-11-2025
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. M. JOSHI
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. M. JOSHI
Bench Type
Single
Category
BAIL ( 51 )
Sub-Category
Regular ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Decision Date
08th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
VIPUL UMESH SOLANKI
Adv. Gaurav Bhawnani
Respondent(s)
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. M. JOSHI
FOR ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS)
FOR ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS)
FOR ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS)
FOR ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS)
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-12-2025 | |
| 24-04-2026 | FOR ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS) |
| 15-04-2026 | FOR ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS) |
| 27-03-2026 | FOR ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS) |
| 25-02-2026 | FOR ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS) |
Orders
Summary The Bombay High Court granted bail to Vipul Umesh Solanki in a murder case (IPC Section 302) primarily on the ground of prolonged incarceration without trial—he had been jailed for over 5 years since October 2020 with charges framed only in February 2025 and no prosecution witnesses examined. The court rejected the State's argument that crime seriousness alone justifies continued detention and released him on a Rs. 30,000 personal recognizance bond with conditions including monthly police check-ins and witness non-contact. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Bombay High Court granted bail to Vipul Umesh Solanki in a murder case (IPC Section 302) primarily on the ground of prolonged incarceration without trial—he had been jailed for over 5 years since October 2020 with charges framed only in February 2025 and no prosecution witnesses examined. The court rejected the State's argument that crime seriousness alone justifies continued detention and released him on a Rs. 30,000 personal recognizance bond with conditions including monthly police check-ins and witness non-contact. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts