SYED TASNEEM BEGUM D/O NIYAMATULLA ALIAS TASNEEM PEERPASHA HUSENI INAMDAR AND ANR vs ABEDA INAMDAR AND ORS Advocate - Sudhanva S Bedekar — WP/6355/2025

Case under Constitution of India Section 226,14,19,21,22,25.32. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM010612042025

Filing Number

WP/23950/2025

Filing Date

26-Nov-2025

Registration No

WP/6355/2025

Registration Date

26-Nov-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sarang Vijaykumar Kotwal , Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandesh Dadasaheb Patil

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sarang Vijaykumar Kotwal , Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandesh Dadasaheb Patil

Bench Type

Division

Category

CRIMINAL ( 9 )

Sub-Category

Habeas Corpus ( 100 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 04-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226,14,19,21,22,25.32
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 61,108,109,113,115,218,219,308,316,324,326
Information Technology Act Section 43A,65,66,66C,66D,66E,72

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SYED TASNEEM BEGUM D/O NIYAMATULLA ALIAS TASNEEM PEERPASHA HUSENI INAMDAR AND ANR

  2. 2.PEERPASHA HUSENI INAMDAR ALIAS DR P.A.INAMDAR (DETENUE)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ABEDA INAMDAR AND ORS Advocate - Sudhanva S Bedekar

  2. 2.TANVEER INAMDAR

  3. 3.IFTEKHAR INAMDAR

  4. 4.PARVEZ INAMDAR

  5. 5.SHAHID INAMDAR

  6. 6.ZAHEEDA SHAHID INAMDAR

  7. 7.ALI RAZA INAMDAR

  8. 8.AMANULLAH INAMDAR

  9. 9.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THOU THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE

  10. 10.ANY OTHER PERSON FOUND TO BE IN PHYSICAL CONTROL OF DR PA INAMDAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sarang Vijaykumar Kotwal,hon'ble Shri Justice Sandesh Dadasaheb PatilView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Bombay High Court dismissed the habeas corpus petition filed by Syed Tasneem Begum challenging the alleged illegal detention of Petitioner No. 2 by respondents. Based on a police report verifying that Petitioner No. 2 is safe, receiving proper medical treatment from a reputed hospital, and was interviewed in person, the court found no evidence of illegal detention and declined to issue any writ of habeas corpus. The petitioner was permitted to pursue other legal remedies if desired. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    For Orders (Due Matters)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sarang Vijaykumar Kotwal , Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandesh Dadasaheb Patil

  4. 25-Mar-2026

    For Orders (Due Matters)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sarang Vijaykumar Kotwal , Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandesh Dadasaheb Patil

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sarang Vijaykumar Kotwal,hon'ble Shri Justice Sandesh Dadasaheb PatilView PDF

  6. 13-Mar-2026

    For Orders (Due Matters)

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Gautam A. Ankhad

  7. 12-Mar-2026

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Gautam A. Ankhad

  8. 18-Feb-2026

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Gautam A. Ankhad

  9. 04-Feb-2026

    For Orders (Due Matters)

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Gautam A. Ankhad

  10. 30-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,hon'ble Shri Justice Gautam A. AnkhadView PDF

  11. 12-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,hon'ble Shri Justice Gautam A. AnkhadView PDF

  12. 12-Jan-2026

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe

  13. 12-Jan-2026

    For Direction

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Bharati Dangre , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shyam C. Chandak

  14. 29-Dec-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. BhobeView PDF

  15. 15-Dec-2025

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Bharati Dangre,hon'ble Shri Justice Shyam C. ChandakView PDF

  16. 03-Dec-2025

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Bharati Dangre,hon'ble Shri Justice Shyam C. ChandakView PDF

  17. 03-Dec-2025

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Bharati Dangre,hon'ble Shri Justice Shyam C. ChandakView PDF

  18. 03-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  19. 26-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/6355/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Bombay High Court dismissed the habeas corpus petition filed by Syed Tasneem Begum challenging the alleged illegal detention of Petitioner No. 2 by respondents. Based on a police report verifying that Petitioner No. 2 is safe, receiving proper medical treatment from a reputed hospital, and was interviewed in person, the court found no evidence of illegal detention and declined to issue any writ of habeas corpus. The petitioner was permitted to pursue other legal remedies if desired. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case