Shantaram Genu Thete vs Dagu Rambhau Vidhate — IA/232/2026
Case under C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section 100. Next hearing: 29th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM010604682024
e-Filing Number
04-12-2024
Filing Number
IA/35174/2024
Filing Date
05-Dec-2024
Registration No
IA/232/2026
Registration Date
09-Jan-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. Jamadar
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. Jamadar
Bench Type
Single
Category
ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )
Sub-Category
ORDINARY CIVIL ( 11 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 04-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Shantaram Genu Thete
Adv. Pramod Narayan Joshi
-
2.Uttam Genu Thete(Legal Heir)
Adv. PRAMOD NARAYAN JOSHI2.
-
3.Sham Uttam Thete
Adv. PRAMOD NARAYAN JOSHI2.
-
4.Sachin Uttam Thete
Adv. PRAMOD NARAYAN JOSHI2.
-
5.Latabai Uttam Thete
Adv. PRAMOD NARAYAN JOSHI2.
-
6.Sunita Anil Patil
Adv. PRAMOD NARAYAN JOSHI
-
7.Bhausaheb Genu Thete
Adv. PRAMOD NARAYAN JOSHI
Respondent(s)
-
1.Dagu Rambhau Vidhate
-
2.Kisanrao Zauru Tidke
-
3.Balasaheb Kisanrao Tidke
-
4.Rajendra Kisanrao Tidke
Case History
-
29-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
29-Apr-2026
For Circulation
Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. Jamadar
-
01-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. JamadarView PDF
Summary: The High Court of Bombay adjourned the hearing of Interim Application No. 232 of 2026 in the Second Appeal between Shantaram Genu Thete (Petitioner) and Dagu Rambhau Vidhate (Respondent) to 29th April 2026 due to paucity of time. Any existing interim order shall continue until the adjourned date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Feb-2026
For Circulation
Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. Jamadar
-
14-Jan-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. JamadarView PDF
-
14-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Dec-2024
Case filed
Registration No. IA/232/2026
Summary: The High Court of Bombay adjourned the hearing of Interim Application No. 232 of 2026 in the Second Appeal between Shantaram Genu Thete (Petitioner) and Dagu Rambhau Vidhate (Respondent) to 29th April 2026 due to paucity of time. Any existing interim order shall continue until the adjourned date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts