Union of India vs Sufiyan Yakub Khan — APPLN/446/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483 (3). Next hearing: 18th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM010603712025
e-Filing Number
17-11-2025
Filing Number
APPLN/23557/2025
Filing Date
22-Nov-2025
Registration No
APPLN/446/2025
Registration Date
25-Nov-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. Joshi
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. Joshi
Bench Type
Single
Category
BAIL ( 51 )
Sub-Category
Cancellation ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Last updated 13-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Union of India
Adv. SK HALWASIA
Respondent(s)
-
1.Sufiyan Yakub Khan
-
2.The State of Maharashtra
Case History
-
18-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
18-Jun-2026
For Admission /Hearing
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. Joshi
-
05-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. JoshiView PDF
The Bombay High Court adjourned CR. APPLICATION NO. 446/2025 filed by Union of India against Sufiyan Yakub Khan to 18/06/2026 due to paucity of time. Any interim order previously passed shall continue until the next hearing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-May-2026
For Admission /Hearing
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. Joshi
-
02-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. JoshiView PDF
-
02-Apr-2026
For Admission /Hearing
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. Joshi
-
11-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. JoshiView PDF
-
11-Mar-2026
For Admission /Hearing
Hon'ble Justice Dr. Neela Kedar Gokhale
-
06-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Justice Dr. Neela Kedar GokhaleView PDF
-
06-Feb-2026
For Admission /Hearing
Hon'ble Justice Dr. Neela Kedar Gokhale
-
13-Jan-2026
Hon'ble Justice Dr. Neela Kedar GokhaleView PDF
-
13-Jan-2026
For Admission /Hearing
Hon'ble Justice Dr. Neela Kedar Gokhale
-
02-Dec-2025
Hon'ble Justice Dr. Neela Kedar GokhaleView PDF
-
02-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. APPLN/446/2025
The Bombay High Court adjourned CR. APPLICATION NO. 446/2025 filed by Union of India against Sufiyan Yakub Khan to 18/06/2026 due to paucity of time. Any interim order previously passed shall continue until the next hearing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts