SIDDHI JITENDRA SHINDE vs BAR COUNCIL OF MAHARASHTRA AND GOA AND ORS Advocate - Yogendra Rajgor — WP/17962/2024
Case under Advocates Act 1961. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 17th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM010597132024
Filing Number
WP/34683/2024
Filing Date
02-12-2024
Registration No
WP/17962/2024
Registration Date
06-12-2024
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. I. CHAGLA , HON'BLE JUSTICE ADVAIT M. SETHNA
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. I. CHAGLA , HON'BLE JUSTICE ADVAIT M. SETHNA
Bench Type
Division
Category
ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS ( 99 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
17th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SIDDHI JITENDRA SHINDE
Adv. Prithviraj Sanjay Gole
Respondent(s)
BAR COUNCIL OF MAHARASHTRA AND GOA AND ORS Advocate - Yogendra Rajgor
CHHATRAPATI SHIVAJI MAHARAJ UNIVERSITY
Adv. Jainendra Sheth
BAR COUNCIL OF INDIA
Adv. PRASAD L GAJBHIYE
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. I. CHAGLA , HON'BLE JUSTICE ADVAIT M. SETHNA
FOR CIRCULATION (URGENT ADMISSION)
DUE ADMISSION - 1
HIGH ON BOARD (HOB)
FOR ADMISSION
HIGH ON BOARD (HOB)
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-12-2024 | FOR CIRCULATION (URGENT ADMISSION) |
| 07-07-2026 | DUE ADMISSION - 1 |
| 10-04-2026 | HIGH ON BOARD (HOB) |
| 04-05-2026 | FOR ADMISSION |
| 11-03-2026 | HIGH ON BOARD (HOB) |
Orders
Summary: The Bombay High Court disposed of the petition without deciding its merits. The petitioner, Siddhi Jitendra Shinde, challenged a Bar Council communication questioning her law course admission despite scoring 43.8% in open category (below the required 45%). The court directed the Bar Council's Enrollment Committee to consider her representation and the university's explanation for her admission within 8 weeks, granting the petitioner an opportunity to present her case before making a final enrollment decision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Bombay High Court disposed of the petition without deciding its merits. The petitioner, Siddhi Jitendra Shinde, challenged a Bar Council communication questioning her law course admission despite scoring 43.8% in open category (below the required 45%). The court directed the Bar Council's Enrollment Committee to consider her representation and the university's explanation for her admission within 8 weeks, granting the petitioner an opportunity to present her case before making a final enrollment decision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts