EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KADWA CANAL, SINCHAN BHAVAN, NASHIK vs RAMGOPAL KACHARU PAWAR AND ORS. — IA/4037/2025
Case under Land Acquisition Act Section 54. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 18th September 2025.
CNR: HCBM010586912024
Filing Number
IA/34094/2024
Filing Date
27-Nov-2024
Registration No
IA/4037/2025
Registration Date
18-Mar-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajesh S. Patil
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajesh S. Patil
Bench Type
Single
Category
FIRST APPEAL ( 53 )
Sub-Category
Other Appeals - Single Bench ( 6 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
18-Sep-2025
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 13-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KADWA CANAL, SINCHAN BHAVAN, NASHIK
Adv. CHAITRALI DESHMUKH
Respondent(s)
-
1.RAMGOPAL KACHARU PAWAR AND ORS.
-
2.SITARAM KACHARU PAWAR
-
3.NARAYAN KANCHARU PAWAR
-
4.SAMADHAN SITARAM PAWAR
-
5.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH DEPUTY COLLECTOR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit BorkarView PDF
Case Summary: IA/4037/2025 The Bombay High Court found that the Executive Engineer, Kadwa Canal satisfied the conditional stay order dated 4 May 2026 by depositing Rs. 16,82,550 on 7 April 2026 relating to Land Reference Nos. 47, 48, and 49 of 2012. The court listed the appeals for regular hearing and granted parties liberty to seek early hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar SundaresanView PDF
-
18-Sep-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajesh S. PatilView PDF
-
22-Apr-2025
Due Admission -
Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh
-
25-Mar-2025
Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. DeshmukhView PDF
-
27-Nov-2024
Case filed
Registration No. IA/4037/2025
Case Summary: IA/4037/2025 The Bombay High Court found that the Executive Engineer, Kadwa Canal satisfied the conditional stay order dated 4 May 2026 by depositing Rs. 16,82,550 on 7 April 2026 relating to Land Reference Nos. 47, 48, and 49 of 2012. The court listed the appeals for regular hearing and granted parties liberty to seek early hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts