GIRI TEXTILES THR PROP CHANDRAYYA R PASNURI vs ANTHONY NADAR AND ANR Advocate - G H KELUSKAR, ,ADEKAR NUPUR SANTOSH — WP/15779/2025

Case under Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946 Section ---. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 30th April 2026.

CNR: HCBM010586152025

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

WP/36389/2025

Filing Date

14-11-2025

Registration No

WP/15779/2025

Registration Date

21-11-2025

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMIT BORKAR

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMIT BORKAR

Bench Type

Single

Category

LABOUR MATTERS SINGLE BENCH ( 65 )

Sub-Category

RETRENCHMANT ( 10 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

30th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Acts & Sections

Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946 Section ---

Petitioner(s)

GIRI TEXTILES THR PROP CHANDRAYYA R PASNURI

Adv. Mulanshu Vora

Respondent(s)

ANTHONY NADAR AND ANR Advocate - G H KELUSKAR, ,ADEKAR NUPUR SANTOSH

M/S JAINAM SILK MILLS

Adv. TRIVENINATH RAMPRASAD YADAV

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMIT BORKAR

27-11-2025

HIGH ON BOARD (HOB)

23-04-2026

FOR CIRCULATION

09-01-2026

HIGH ON BOARD (HOB)

19-12-2025

HIGH ON BOARD (HOB)

Orders

30-04-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMIT BORKAR

Case Summary: Giri Textiles v. Anthony Nadar (WP 15779/2025) The High Court of Bombay dismissed the writ petition filed by Giri Textiles challenging the Labour Court and Industrial Court orders rejecting its objection that the employee's application was unmaintainable due to non-compliance with Section 42(4) of the Maharashtra Industrial Relations Act (requiring a mandatory approach notice before filing). The Court held that where the employer's identity and employment nature were themselves disputed in prior proceedings, strict procedural compliance cannot be rigidly imposed on a weaker workman who lacked clarity on who constituted the actual employer. The Court found the lower courts correctly characterized the objection as hypertechnical, noting the employer failed to produce conclusive evidence of communicating the termination order to the employee, thereby bearing the burden of proving compliance with limitation requirements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Giri Textiles v. Anthony Nadar (WP 15779/2025) The High Court of Bombay dismissed the writ petition filed by Giri Textiles challenging the Labour Court and Industrial Court orders rejecting its objection that the employee's application was unmaintainable due to non-compliance with Section 42(4) of the Maharashtra Industrial Relations Act (requiring a mandatory approach notice before filing). The Court held that where the employer's identity and employment nature were themselves disputed in prior proceedings, strict procedural compliance cannot be rigidly imposed on a weaker workman who lacked clarity on who constituted the actual employer. The Court found the lower courts correctly characterized the objection as hypertechnical, noting the employer failed to produce conclusive evidence of communicating the termination order to the employee, thereby bearing the burden of proving compliance with limitation requirements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case