GIRI TEXTILES THR PROP CHANDRAYYA R PASNURI vs ANTHONY NADAR AND ANR Advocate - G H KELUSKAR, ,ADEKAR NUPUR SANTOSH — WP/15779/2025
Case under Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946 Section ---. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 30th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM010586152025
Filing Number
WP/36389/2025
Filing Date
14-11-2025
Registration No
WP/15779/2025
Registration Date
21-11-2025
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMIT BORKAR
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMIT BORKAR
Bench Type
Single
Category
LABOUR MATTERS SINGLE BENCH ( 65 )
Sub-Category
RETRENCHMANT ( 10 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
30th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
GIRI TEXTILES THR PROP CHANDRAYYA R PASNURI
Adv. Mulanshu Vora
Respondent(s)
ANTHONY NADAR AND ANR Advocate - G H KELUSKAR, ,ADEKAR NUPUR SANTOSH
M/S JAINAM SILK MILLS
Adv. TRIVENINATH RAMPRASAD YADAV
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMIT BORKAR
HIGH ON BOARD (HOB)
FOR CIRCULATION
HIGH ON BOARD (HOB)
HIGH ON BOARD (HOB)
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 27-11-2025 | HIGH ON BOARD (HOB) |
| 23-04-2026 | FOR CIRCULATION |
| 09-01-2026 | HIGH ON BOARD (HOB) |
| 19-12-2025 | HIGH ON BOARD (HOB) |
Orders
Case Summary: Giri Textiles v. Anthony Nadar (WP 15779/2025) The High Court of Bombay dismissed the writ petition filed by Giri Textiles challenging the Labour Court and Industrial Court orders rejecting its objection that the employee's application was unmaintainable due to non-compliance with Section 42(4) of the Maharashtra Industrial Relations Act (requiring a mandatory approach notice before filing). The Court held that where the employer's identity and employment nature were themselves disputed in prior proceedings, strict procedural compliance cannot be rigidly imposed on a weaker workman who lacked clarity on who constituted the actual employer. The Court found the lower courts correctly characterized the objection as hypertechnical, noting the employer failed to produce conclusive evidence of communicating the termination order to the employee, thereby bearing the burden of proving compliance with limitation requirements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Giri Textiles v. Anthony Nadar (WP 15779/2025) The High Court of Bombay dismissed the writ petition filed by Giri Textiles challenging the Labour Court and Industrial Court orders rejecting its objection that the employee's application was unmaintainable due to non-compliance with Section 42(4) of the Maharashtra Industrial Relations Act (requiring a mandatory approach notice before filing). The Court held that where the employer's identity and employment nature were themselves disputed in prior proceedings, strict procedural compliance cannot be rigidly imposed on a weaker workman who lacked clarity on who constituted the actual employer. The Court found the lower courts correctly characterized the objection as hypertechnical, noting the employer failed to produce conclusive evidence of communicating the termination order to the employee, thereby bearing the burden of proving compliance with limitation requirements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts