SANDHYA SOMBAHADUR GURUNG AND ORS vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY REVENU AND ORS — WP/16682/2025

Case under Mah. Private Forests Act,1975 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 05th May 2026.

CNR: HCBM010583832025

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

WP/36273/2025

Filing Date

13-11-2025

Registration No

WP/16682/2025

Registration Date

08-12-2025

Judge

HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE BHARATI DANGRE , HON'BLE JUSTICE SMT MANJUSHA AJAY DESHPANDE

Coram

HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE BHARATI DANGRE , HON'BLE JUSTICE SMT MANJUSHA AJAY DESHPANDE

Bench Type

Division

Category

FORESTS ( 27 )

Sub-Category

STATE FOREST ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

05th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Acts & Sections

Mah. Private Forests Act,1975 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

SANDHYA SOMBAHADUR GURUNG AND ORS

Adv. Vijay Killedar

SAMRAT SOMBAHADUR GURUNG

SAMRUDDHA SOMBAHADUR GURUNG

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY REVENU AND ORS

TALATHI, SAJA

CIRCLE OFFICER, BADLAPUR

THE CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FOREST, THANE

THE FOREST RANGE OFFICER (CONSERVATION), BADLAPUR

COLLECTOR, THANE

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE BHARATI DANGRE , HON'BLE JUSTICE SMT MANJUSHA AJAY DESHPANDE

04-12-2025

OBJECTIONS TO BE REMOVED

18-12-2025

DUE ADMISSION - 1

05-05-2026

FOR ADMISSION

04-05-2026

FOR ADMISSION

29-04-2026

FOR ADMISSION

Orders

05-05-2026
HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE BHARATI DANGRE,HON'BLE JUSTICE SMT MANJUSHA AJAY DESHPANDE

Summary: The Bombay High Court set aside Mutation Entry No. 1180 (dated 28.05.2006) that classified the petitioners' lands as "Private Forest" under the Maharashtra Private Forest (Acquisition) Act, 1975. The court found that while a notification under Section 35(1) of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 was issued in 1958, there was no proof of service of the mandatory notice under Section 35(3) to the then-owners, and the respondents could not produce any evidence of such service. Following Supreme Court precedent in *Godrej and Boyce Manufacturing Company Limited*, the court held that proof of notice issuance and service is essential before declaring land as "Private Forest," which was absent here. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Bombay High Court set aside Mutation Entry No. 1180 (dated 28.05.2006) that classified the petitioners' lands as "Private Forest" under the Maharashtra Private Forest (Acquisition) Act, 1975. The court found that while a notification under Section 35(1) of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 was issued in 1958, there was no proof of service of the mandatory notice under Section 35(3) to the then-owners, and the respondents could not produce any evidence of such service. Following Supreme Court precedent in *Godrej and Boyce Manufacturing Company Limited*, the court held that proof of notice issuance and service is essential before declaring land as "Private Forest," which was absent here. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case