MRS.ARISTA NITIN NACHANE ALIAS MADHAVI NITIN NACHANE vs NITIN KRUSHNARAO NACHANE. Advocate - VYAS HITESH PURUSHOTTAM — FCA/123/2025

Case under Family Court Act Section 19. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.

CNR: HCBM010579342025

Next Hearing

19th June 2026

Filing Number

FCA/35997/2025

Filing Date

11-11-2025

Registration No

FCA/123/2025

Registration Date

19-11-2025

Judge

HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE BHARATI DANGRE , HON'BLE JUSTICE SMT MANJUSHA AJAY DESHPANDE

Coram

HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE BHARATI DANGRE , HON'BLE JUSTICE SMT MANJUSHA AJAY DESHPANDE

Bench Type

Division

Category

FAMILY LAW ( 16 )

Sub-Category

DIVORCE/DISSOLUTION ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Acts & Sections

Family Court Act Section 19

Petitioner(s)

MRS.ARISTA NITIN NACHANE ALIAS MADHAVI NITIN NACHANE

Adv. FORAM CHAUHAN

Respondent(s)

NITIN KRUSHNARAO NACHANE. Advocate - VYAS HITESH PURUSHOTTAM

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE BHARATI DANGRE , HON'BLE JUSTICE SMT MANJUSHA AJAY DESHPANDE

25-11-2025

FRESH ADMISSION

08-05-2026

FOR ADMISSION

13-03-2026

FOR CIRCULATION

14-01-2026

FRESH ADMISSION

Orders

08-05-2026
HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE BHARATI DANGRE,HON'BLE JUSTICE SMT MANJUSHA AJAY DESHPANDE

In Family Court Appeal No. 123 of 2025, the Bombay High Court (Justices Bharati Dangre and Manjusha Deshpande) ordered on 8th May 2026 that the case be referred to mediation. The court substituted the originally appointed mediator (Senior Advocate Ms Seema Sarnaik) with Advocate Mr. Piyush Shah due to scheduling constraints. The mediator is directed to submit a report within six weeks of the first mediation meeting, with parties required to appear physically or virtually before the mediator. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

In Family Court Appeal No. 123 of 2025, the Bombay High Court (Justices Bharati Dangre and Manjusha Deshpande) ordered on 8th May 2026 that the case be referred to mediation. The court substituted the originally appointed mediator (Senior Advocate Ms Seema Sarnaik) with Advocate Mr. Piyush Shah due to scheduling constraints. The mediator is directed to submit a report within six weeks of the first mediation meeting, with parties required to appear physically or virtually before the mediator. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case