BRAMHA DHANRAJ KUSHWAHA vs DELTA MANUFACTURING LTD AND ANR Advocate - Mrunal Pandya — WP/17432/2025
Case under Ma. Agri. Products Marketing Act 1964 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 07th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM010575402025
Filing Number
WP/35762/2025
Filing Date
10-11-2025
Registration No
WP/17432/2025
Registration Date
20-12-2025
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMIT BORKAR
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMIT BORKAR
Bench Type
Single
Category
LABOUR MATTERS DB ( 19 )
Sub-Category
DISMISSAL/TERMINATION ( 5 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
07th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
BRAMHA DHANRAJ KUSHWAHA
Adv. Devmani Shukla
Respondent(s)
DELTA MANUFACTURING LTD AND ANR Advocate - Mrunal Pandya
YUVA ADARSH KAMGAR UNION NASHIK
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMIT BORKAR
OBJECTIONS TO BE REMOVED
FOR CIRCULATION
FOR ADMISSION
FOR ADMISSION
FOR CIRCULATION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 28-11-2025 | OBJECTIONS TO BE REMOVED |
| 12-03-2026 | FOR CIRCULATION |
| 30-04-2026 | FOR ADMISSION |
| 17-04-2026 | FOR ADMISSION |
| 02-04-2026 | FOR CIRCULATION |
Orders
The Bombay High Court dismissed the writ petition of Bramha Dhanraj Kushwaha, a permanent worker dismissed by Delta Manufacturing Ltd in 2018 for alleged misconduct involving work stoppage and disruptive behavior. The court upheld the Labour Court's findings that the domestic enquiry was conducted fairly and the dismissal was justified, rejecting claims of bias against the enquiry officer and finding sufficient witness evidence supporting the misconduct charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Bombay High Court dismissed the writ petition of Bramha Dhanraj Kushwaha, a permanent worker dismissed by Delta Manufacturing Ltd in 2018 for alleged misconduct involving work stoppage and disruptive behavior. The court upheld the Labour Court's findings that the domestic enquiry was conducted fairly and the dismissal was justified, rejecting claims of bias against the enquiry officer and finding sufficient witness evidence supporting the misconduct charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts