INDUDEVI ANIL TIWARI AND ORS vs THE SENIOR INSPECTOR OF POLICE AND ORS — WP/5857/2025
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 14th November 2025.
CNR: HCBM010573402025
Filing Number
WP/22214/2025
Filing Date
07-Nov-2025
Registration No
WP/5857/2025
Registration Date
07-Nov-2025
Judge
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Gautam A. Ankhad
Coram
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Gautam A. Ankhad
Bench Type
Division
Category
CRIMINAL ( 9 )
Sub-Category
QUASHING OF FIR C.R., CHARGE SHEET OR PROSECUTION ( 26 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Decision Date
14-Nov-2025
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 13-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.INDUDEVI ANIL TIWARI AND ORS
Adv. WAGH SWAPNIL LAXMAN
-
2.ABHAY ANIL TIWARI
-
3.MAMATA ANIL TIWARI
-
4.JYOTI ANIL TIWARI
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE SENIOR INSPECTOR OF POLICE AND ORS
-
2.MADHURI PINTU SINGH
-
3.THE STATE OF MAHARASTHRA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-May-2026
Hon'ble The Chief Justice,hon'ble Shri Justice Gautam A. AnkhadView PDF
-
14-Nov-2025
Hon'ble The Chief Justice,hon'ble Shri Justice Gautam A. AnkhadView PDF
-
14-Nov-2025
Hon'ble The Chief Justice,hon'ble Shri Justice Gautam A. AnkhadView PDF
The Bombay High Court allowed the writ petition and quashed FIR No.115 of 2025 and the related charge-sheet, finding that the dispute arose from a private transaction between the parties who have since amicably resolved their differences. The court exercised its inherent jurisdiction under Article 226, relying on the Supreme Court's principle in Gian Singh v. State of Punjab that criminal proceedings involving private disputes can be quashed when parties settle, as continuation would be futile. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Nov-2025
Fresh Admission
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Gautam A. Ankhad
-
07-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. WP/5857/2025
The Bombay High Court allowed the writ petition and quashed FIR No.115 of 2025 and the related charge-sheet, finding that the dispute arose from a private transaction between the parties who have since amicably resolved their differences. The court exercised its inherent jurisdiction under Article 226, relying on the Supreme Court's principle in Gian Singh v. State of Punjab that criminal proceedings involving private disputes can be quashed when parties settle, as continuation would be futile. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts