M/S AIRAVAT INDUSTRIES AND ANR. vs THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF BANK OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS. — AO/597/2025

Case under C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section 96. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM010565922025

Filing Number

AO/35261/2025

Filing Date

04-Nov-2025

Registration No

AO/597/2025

Registration Date

14-Nov-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav

Bench Type

Single

Category

CIVIL APPEALS ( 45 )

Sub-Category

Single Bench Matters ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 04-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section 96

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/S AIRAVAT INDUSTRIES AND ANR.

    Adv. Adv Hemali Merva

  2. 2.MR. SANTOSH BALU JAWALE PARTNER OF M/S AIRVAT INDUSTRIES

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF BANK OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

    Adv. ,GOVERNMENT PLEADER AS,GOVERNMENT PLEADER AS,GOVERNMENT PLEADER AS 1123

  2. 2.BANK OF MAHARASHTRA

  3. 3.CHIEF MANAGER AND AUTHORISED OFFICER BANK OF MAHARASHTRA

  4. 4.MINISTRY OF MICRO SMALL AND MEDIUM ENTERPRISES

  5. 5.UNION OF INDIA

  6. 6.RESERVE BANK OF INDIA

  7. 7.INSPECTOR OF POLICE

  8. 8.INSPECTOR OF POLICE

  9. 9.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR ITS CHIEF SECRETARY

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Aug-2026

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF

    The Bombay High Court allowed Airavat Industries' appeal and quashed the trial court's October 14, 2025 order denying exemption from Section 80(2) CPC notice requirement. The court dispensed with the notice requirement, citing that Plaintiff No. 1 is an MSME and the prima facie facts were undisputed, while granting a four-week moratorium on coercive action against the secured residential asset and reserving all merits for trial consideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav

  7. 05-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF

  8. 26-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF

  9. 26-Feb-2026

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav

  10. 26-Feb-2026

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav

  11. 12-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF

  12. 12-Feb-2026

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav

  13. 29-Jan-2026

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav

  14. 22-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF

  15. 08-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF

  16. 08-Jan-2026

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav

  17. 12-Dec-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF

  18. 11-Dec-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF

  19. 11-Dec-2025

    For Direction

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav

  20. 27-Nov-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF

  21. 27-Nov-2025

    For Direction

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav

  22. 20-Nov-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF

  23. 20-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  24. 04-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. AO/597/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court allowed Airavat Industries' appeal and quashed the trial court's October 14, 2025 order denying exemption from Section 80(2) CPC notice requirement. The court dispensed with the notice requirement, citing that Plaintiff No. 1 is an MSME and the prima facie facts were undisputed, while granting a four-week moratorium on coercive action against the secured residential asset and reserving all merits for trial consideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case