RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED vs SMT. TASLEEM ASHFAK DESHPANDE AND ORS. Advocate - TJMENDON, FOR RES.NO.1 TO 8 — FA/934/2018
Case under Motor Vehicles Act,1939 Section 173. Disposed: Contested--Allowed To be withdrawn on 26th March 2026.
CNR: HCBM010557302017
Filing Number
FA/36414/2017
Filing Date
21-Dec-2017
Registration No
FA/934/2018
Registration Date
30-Aug-2018
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain
Bench Type
Single
Category
COMPENSATION ( 7 )
Sub-Category
INSURER LIABILITY MATTERS ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
26-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed To be withdrawn
Last updated 21-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED
Adv. poonam mital
Respondent(s)
-
1.SMT. TASLEEM ASHFAK DESHPANDE AND ORS. Advocate - TJMENDON, FOR RES.NO.1 TO 8
-
2.ESSA ASHFAK DESHPANDE (MIONOR,)
-
3.ARHAN ASHFAK DESHPANDE (MIONOR)
-
4.NAZIR AHMED ZULFUMIYA DESHPANDE
-
5.KHAIRUNNISA NAZIR DESHPANDE
-
6.JUBER NAZIR DESHPANDE
-
7.NAGMA NAZIR DESHPANDE (MIONOR)
-
8.AFTAF NAZIR DESHPANDE (MIONOR)
-
9.RITA AMARNATH BHATIA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
26-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal JainView PDF
The High Court of Bombay allowed Reliance General Insurance Company Limited's appeal to be withdrawn by praecipe on 26 March 2026. The court ordered that any security deposit be transferred to the concerned MACT, court fees refunded per rules, and any interim relief granted be vacated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
28-Sep-2020
For Orders
According To Sitting List
- 22-Oct-2018
- 17-Sep-2018
-
09-Aug-2018
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
21-Dec-2017
Case filed
Registration No. FA/934/2018
The High Court of Bombay allowed Reliance General Insurance Company Limited's appeal to be withdrawn by praecipe on 26 March 2026. The court ordered that any security deposit be transferred to the concerned MACT, court fees refunded per rules, and any interim relief granted be vacated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts