SHRI. NIVRUTTI KARBHARI PAGARE AND ORS vs SHRI. VITTHAL KARBHARI PAGARE (DECD.THR.LRS) SMT, MAINABAI VITTHAL PAGARE AND ORS — IA/30633/2022

Case under C.p.c.- (Non-interlocutory Order) Section 100. Next hearing: 01st July 2026.

CNR: HCBM010553202022

Next Hearing

01st July 2026

Filing Number

IA/32910/2022

Filing Date

23-12-2022

Registration No

IA/30633/2022

Registration Date

27-12-2022

Judge

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GAURI GODSE

Coram

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GAURI GODSE

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Acts & Sections

C.p.c.- (Non-interlocutory Order) Section 100

Petitioner(s)

SHRI. NIVRUTTI KARBHARI PAGARE AND ORS

Adv. Dnyaneshwahar Deshmukh

Respondent(s)

SHRI. VITTHAL KARBHARI PAGARE (DECD.THR.LRS) SMT, MAINABAI VITTHAL PAGARE AND ORS

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GAURI GODSE

01-07-2026

FOR ORDERS (DUE MATTERS)

06-05-2026

FOR ORDERS (DUE MATTERS)

08-10-2025

FOR ORDERS (DUE MATTERS)

23-04-2025

FOR ORDERS (DUE MATTERS)

11-02-2025

FOR ORDERS (DUE MATTERS)

Orders

06-05-2026
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GAURI GODSE

Case Summary: IA/30633/2022 In this interim application before the Bombay High Court (dated May 6, 2026), the court issued notice to respondents 3A-3E returnable July 1, 2026, requiring appellants' counsel to serve them privately and file service affidavits. The court also granted leave to amend pleadings to add heirs of deceased respondent no. 3 within three weeks, after which notices would be issued to added respondents. The underlying second appeal concerns whether a deed constitutes a valid partition vesting absolute rights when the plaintiff sold the allotted property as an independent owner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: IA/30633/2022 In this interim application before the Bombay High Court (dated May 6, 2026), the court issued notice to respondents 3A-3E returnable July 1, 2026, requiring appellants' counsel to serve them privately and file service affidavits. The court also granted leave to amend pleadings to add heirs of deceased respondent no. 3 within three weeks, after which notices would be issued to added respondents. The underlying second appeal concerns whether a deed constitutes a valid partition vesting absolute rights when the plaintiff sold the allotted property as an independent owner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case