VIPIN ALIAS BlPIN RAMNARESH AGRAWAL vs The State of Maharashtra — REVN/460/2025
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 397 r/w 401. Disposed: --Disposed Off on 06th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM010552422025
e-Filing Number
15-10-2025
Filing Number
REVN/21251/2025
Filing Date
17-Oct-2025
Registration No
REVN/460/2025
Registration Date
28-Oct-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shivkumar Dige
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shivkumar Dige
Bench Type
Single
Category
CRIMINAL ( 9 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS ( 99 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Decision Date
06-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
--Disposed Off
Last updated 22-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.VIPIN ALIAS BlPIN RAMNARESH AGRAWAL
Adv. Punit
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Maharashtra
-
2.DIPALI PARVINDAR SINGH
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
15-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shivkumar DigeView PDF
-
15-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shivkumar DigeView PDF
The Bombay High Court allowed the revision application and discharged applicant Vipin Agrawal of charges under IPC Sections 354, 504, and 506. The court held that his mere statement assuring confidentiality did not constitute any offence and lacked the requisite sexual intent alleged in the FIR, distinguishing his conduct from the co-accused who actually demanded sexual favors. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shivkumar DigeView PDF
-
06-Apr-2026
For Passing Order
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shivkumar Dige
-
26-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shivkumar DigeView PDF
-
26-Mar-2026
For Passing Order
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shivkumar Dige
-
16-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shivkumar DigeView PDF
-
16-Mar-2026
For Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shivkumar Dige
-
09-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shivkumar DigeView PDF
-
09-Mar-2026
For Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shivkumar Dige
-
05-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shivkumar DigeView PDF
-
05-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Oct-2025
Case filed
Registration No. REVN/460/2025
The Bombay High Court allowed the revision application and discharged applicant Vipin Agrawal of charges under IPC Sections 354, 504, and 506. The court held that his mere statement assuring confidentiality did not constitute any offence and lacked the requisite sexual intent alleged in the FIR, distinguishing his conduct from the co-accused who actually demanded sexual favors. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts