RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED THROUGH ITS CORPORATE OFFICE vs SMT. MANIHA SAMPAT HILAM UNDER THE GUARDIANSHIP OF MIRABAI SAMPAT HILAM AND ANR. — HCBM10550062018

Case under Motor Vehicles Act,1939 Section 173. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HCBM010550062018

Filing Number

FA/34339/2018

Filing Date

01-Dec-2018

Judge

Hon'ble Ms Justice Aarti A. Sathe , National Lok Adalat

Coram

Hon'ble Ms Justice Aarti A. Sathe , National Lok Adalat

Bench Type

Single

Category

COMPENSATION ( 7 )

Sub-Category

INSURER LIABILITY MATTERS ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 13-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act,1939 Section 173

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED THROUGH ITS CORPORATE OFFICE

    Adv. KMC LEGAL VENTURE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SMT. MANIHA SAMPAT HILAM UNDER THE GUARDIANSHIP OF MIRABAI SAMPAT HILAM AND ANR.

  2. 2.SHRI. MURUJESAN

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-May-2026

    Hon'ble Ms Justice Aarti A. Sathe,national Lok AdalatView PDF

    SUMMARY: The case involving Reliance General Insurance Company Limited and Smt. Maniha Sampat Hilam (under guardianship) was scheduled before the National Lok Adalat at Bombay High Court on 9th May 2026. The matter was adjourned as none of the parties appeared before the court. The case has been transferred to the regular court for further proceedings, with liberty granted to parties to file settlement proposals if desired. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Dec-2018

    Notification

    Registrar (Judicial - I)

  4. 01-Dec-2018

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY: The case involving Reliance General Insurance Company Limited and Smt. Maniha Sampat Hilam (under guardianship) was scheduled before the National Lok Adalat at Bombay High Court on 9th May 2026. The matter was adjourned as none of the parties appeared before the court. The case has been transferred to the regular court for further proceedings, with liberty granted to parties to file settlement proposals if desired. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case