Marathon Electric India Private Limited UBR LEGAL ADVOCATES vs Union of India — WP/15242/2025
Case under Central Goods and Services Tax (Amendment) Act Section 54. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 16th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM010536942025
e-Filing Number
08-10-2025
Filing Number
WP/33675/2025
Filing Date
10-10-2025
Registration No
WP/15242/2025
Registration Date
11-11-2025
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE G. S. KULKARNI , HON'BLE MS JUSTICE AARTI A. SATHE
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE G. S. KULKARNI , HON'BLE MS JUSTICE AARTI A. SATHE
Bench Type
Division
Category
INDIRECT TAXES ( 17 )
Sub-Category
GST Goods and Services Tax ( 100 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
16th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Marathon Electric India Private Limited UBR LEGAL ADVOCATES
Respondent(s)
Union of India
State of Maharashtra
The Deputy Commissioner Of State Tax, PUN APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor) E
The State Tax Officer PIMPLE GURAV 701
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE G. S. KULKARNI , HON'BLE MS JUSTICE AARTI A. SATHE
FOR CIRCULATION
FOR ADMISSION
FOR CIRCULATION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-04-2026 | FOR CIRCULATION |
| 16-04-2026 | FOR ADMISSION |
| 15-04-2026 | FOR CIRCULATION |
Orders
Court Summary The Bombay High Court quashed the April 24, 2023 order rejecting Marathon Electric India's GST refund claim of Rs. 54,31,283 for export of IT services, finding the order lacked specific reasoned findings and was thus a "non-speaking order." The court remanded the matter to the Appellate Authority for de novo reconsideration within three months, keeping all contentions open for fresh adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Summary The Bombay High Court quashed the April 24, 2023 order rejecting Marathon Electric India's GST refund claim of Rs. 54,31,283 for export of IT services, finding the order lacked specific reasoned findings and was thus a "non-speaking order." The court remanded the matter to the Appellate Authority for de novo reconsideration within three months, keeping all contentions open for fresh adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts