SURENDRA GADLING vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR. — APEAL/1342/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code (I.p.c) Section 153(A),505(1)(B),117,120(B),34. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 04th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM010536652019
Next Hearing
02nd January 2020
Filing Number
BA/3603/2019
Filing Date
19-12-2019
Registration No
APEAL/1342/2024
Registration Date
19-12-2019
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE A.S. GADKARI , HON'BLE JUSTICE KAMAL KHATA
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE A.S. GADKARI , HON'BLE JUSTICE KAMAL KHATA
Bench Type
Division
Category
CRIMINAL APPEAL ( 58 )
Sub-Category
Appeal Misc. Others ( 14 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Decision Date
04th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SURENDRA GADLING
Adv. RAHUL AROTE
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.
NATIONAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY THROUGH ITS SUPERINTENDENT VIKRAM KHATATE
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE A.S. GADKARI , HON'BLE JUSTICE KAMAL KHATA
FOR BAIL APPLICATION FRESH ADMISSION
BOTTOM OF BOARD-
-DUE ADMISSION
-ADMISSION
-ADMISSION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-01-2020 | FOR BAIL APPLICATION FRESH ADMISSION |
| 04-05-2026 | BOTTOM OF BOARD- |
| 24-04-2026 | -DUE ADMISSION |
| 20-04-2026 | -ADMISSION |
| 15-04-2026 | -ADMISSION |
Orders
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE A.S. GADKARI,HON'BLE JUSTICE KAMAL KHATA
Court Decision Summary The Bombay High Court granted bail to advocate Surendra Gadling, who had spent 7 years and 11 months in pre-trial detention on UAPA charges, while all 15 co-accused were already released. The court applied the *Union of India v. K.A. Najeeb* principle, holding that prolonged incarceration combined with unlikely trial completion within reasonable time justifies bail despite statutory restrictions, balancing constitutional rights against investigation interests. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Bombay High Court granted bail to advocate Surendra Gadling, who had spent 7 years and 11 months in pre-trial detention on UAPA charges, while all 15 co-accused were already released. The court applied the *Union of India v. K.A. Najeeb* principle, holding that prolonged incarceration combined with unlikely trial completion within reasonable time justifies bail despite statutory restrictions, balancing constitutional rights against investigation interests. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts