COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, PROSECUTION CELL, CSMIA, MUMBAI THROUGH PATEL PARESH JASHWANTLAL vs MARIN D/O KAZUYOSHI KATAIGI AND ORS. — ALS/8/2025
Case under Customs Act, 1962 Section 132,135(1)(a),135(1)(b),135(1)(i). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 05th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM010535472024
e-Filing Number
21-10-2024
Filing Number
ALS/22442/2024
Filing Date
22-Oct-2024
Registration No
ALS/8/2025
Registration Date
17-Mar-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. Sathaye
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. Sathaye
Bench Type
Single
Category
CRIMINAL APPEAL ( 58 )
Sub-Category
Against Acquittal - By Complainant-Victim (372)Cr.P.C/ (413) BNSS ( 5 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Decision Date
05-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 13-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, PROSECUTION CELL, CSMIA, MUMBAI THROUGH PATEL PARESH JASHWANTLAL
Adv. Atif Shaikh
Respondent(s)
-
1.MARIN D/O KAZUYOSHI KATAIGI AND ORS.
-
2.SHIGERU S/O MASARU HIKAWA
-
3.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
05-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. SathayeView PDF
Case Summary: ALS/8/2025 The Bombay High Court granted leave to appeal to the Commissioner of Customs against the acquittal of two Japanese nationals charged with customs violations and illegal foreign currency smuggling under the Customs Act, 1962 and FEMA, 1999. The court found that while the magistrate's acquittal was based on insufficient evidence linking the seized currency to the accused, issues regarding the validity of the prosecution sanction and the gravity of alleged gold smuggling warranted deeper judicial reconsideration, making the case suitable for appellate review. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Mar-2026
-Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne
-
25-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. MarneView PDF
-
25-Feb-2026
-Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne
-
21-Jan-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. MarneView PDF
-
21-Jan-2026
For Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne
-
17-Dec-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. MarneView PDF
-
17-Dec-2025
For Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne
-
18-Nov-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. MarneView PDF
-
18-Nov-2025
For Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne
-
01-Oct-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. MarneView PDF
-
01-Aug-2025
Due Admission - 1
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak
-
20-Jun-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. ModakView PDF
-
20-Jun-2025
For Admission /Hearing
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shivkumar Dige
-
08-May-2025
For Admission /Hearing
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shivkumar Dige
-
07-May-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shivkumar DigeView PDF
-
07-May-2025
For Admission /Hearing
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shivkumar Dige
-
02-May-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shivkumar DigeView PDF
-
02-May-2025
For Admission /Hearing
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shivkumar Dige
-
22-Apr-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shivkumar DigeView PDF
-
22-Apr-2025
For Admission /Hearing
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shivkumar Dige
-
08-Apr-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shivkumar DigeView PDF
-
08-Apr-2025
For Admission /Hearing
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shivkumar Dige
-
04-Apr-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shivkumar DigeView PDF
-
04-Apr-2025
For Admission /Hearing
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shivkumar Dige
-
27-Mar-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shivkumar DigeView PDF
-
27-Mar-2025
For Admission /Hearing
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shivkumar Dige
-
06-Mar-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-Oct-2024
Case filed
Registration No. ALS/8/2025
Case Summary: ALS/8/2025 The Bombay High Court granted leave to appeal to the Commissioner of Customs against the acquittal of two Japanese nationals charged with customs violations and illegal foreign currency smuggling under the Customs Act, 1962 and FEMA, 1999. The court found that while the magistrate's acquittal was based on insufficient evidence linking the seized currency to the accused, issues regarding the validity of the prosecution sanction and the gravity of alleged gold smuggling warranted deeper judicial reconsideration, making the case suitable for appellate review. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts