NITIN SHANKAR SHINDE vs THE CLOTH MARKET AND SHOPS LABOUR Advocate - B.S. Mahamulkar — WP/15202/2025
Case under Mah. Mathadi Kamgar, Hamal & or. Manu.work 1969 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 17th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM010535072025
Filing Number
WP/33576/2025
Filing Date
09-Oct-2025
Registration No
WP/15202/2025
Registration Date
10-Nov-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla , Hon'ble Justice Advait M. Sethna
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla , Hon'ble Justice Advait M. Sethna
Bench Type
Division
Category
LABOUR MATTERS DB ( 19 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS ( 99 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
17-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 24-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.NITIN SHANKAR SHINDE
Adv. Vaibhav Jagdale
-
2.VAIBHAV DNYANESHWAR NAVALE
-
3.SUMIT DILIP BALSARAF
-
4.SATISH SAHADEV DOKE
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE CLOTH MARKET AND SHOPS LABOUR Advocate - B.S. Mahamulkar
-
2.THE SECRETARY THE CLOTH MARKET AND SHOPS LABOUR BOARD GREATER MUMBAI (FOR MUMBAI THANE RAIGAD)
Adv. B.S. Mahamulkar
-
3.JOINT LABOUR COMMISSIONER (MATHADI) MUMBAI
-
4.PRASHANT MARUTI GUNJAL
-
5.UMESH BABANRAO BATWAL
-
6.MANGESH CHAVAN
-
7.PRATAP DOKE
-
8.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA LABOUR INDUSTRIES AND ENERGY DEPARTMENT
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Jun-2026
For Circulation
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla , Hon'ble Justice Advait M. Sethna
-
29-Apr-2026
Due Admission - 1
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla , Hon'ble Justice Advait M. Sethna
-
17-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla,hon'ble Justice Advait M. SethnaView PDF
The Bombay High Court held that the Labour Minister's direction to the Board Secretary to pass the impugned order dated 26 September 2025 was improper and should not have been issued. The court stayed implementation of the order until the Labour Minister decides a pending representation from Respondents 4-7 (within six weeks), plus two additional weeks, while reserving all substantive rights of the parties for future proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Apr-2026
For Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla , Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. Sathaye
-
16-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla,hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. SathayeView PDF
-
16-Apr-2026
For Direction
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla , Hon'ble Justice Advait M. Sethna
-
15-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla,hon'ble Justice Advait M. SethnaView PDF
-
30-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla,hon'ble Justice Advait M. SethnaView PDF
-
09-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla,hon'ble Justice Advait M. SethnaView PDF
-
09-Mar-2026
Due Admission - 1
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla , Hon'ble Justice Advait M. Sethna
-
04-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla,hon'ble Justice Advait M. SethnaView PDF
-
04-Feb-2026
Due Admission - 1
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla , Hon'ble Justice Advait M. Sethna
-
29-Jan-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla,hon'ble Justice Advait M. SethnaView PDF
-
29-Jan-2026
Fresh Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe
-
11-Dec-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge,hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. BhobeView PDF
-
11-Dec-2025
Fresh Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe
-
28-Nov-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge,hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. BhobeView PDF
-
28-Nov-2025
Fresh Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe
-
17-Nov-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge,hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. BhobeView PDF
-
17-Nov-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Oct-2025
Case filed
Registration No. WP/15202/2025
The Bombay High Court held that the Labour Minister's direction to the Board Secretary to pass the impugned order dated 26 September 2025 was improper and should not have been issued. The court stayed implementation of the order until the Labour Minister decides a pending representation from Respondents 4-7 (within six weeks), plus two additional weeks, while reserving all substantive rights of the parties for future proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts