NITIN SHANKAR SHINDE vs THE CLOTH MARKET AND SHOPS LABOUR Advocate - B.S. Mahamulkar — WP/15202/2025
Case under Mah. Mathadi Kamgar, Hamal & or. Manu.work 1969 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 17th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM010535072025
Filing Number
WP/33576/2025
Filing Date
09-10-2025
Registration No
WP/15202/2025
Registration Date
10-11-2025
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. I. CHAGLA , HON'BLE JUSTICE ADVAIT M. SETHNA
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. I. CHAGLA , HON'BLE JUSTICE ADVAIT M. SETHNA
Bench Type
Division
Category
LABOUR MATTERS DB ( 19 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS ( 99 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
17th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
NITIN SHANKAR SHINDE
Adv. Vaibhav Jagdale
VAIBHAV DNYANESHWAR NAVALE
SUMIT DILIP BALSARAF
SATISH SAHADEV DOKE
Respondent(s)
THE CLOTH MARKET AND SHOPS LABOUR Advocate - B.S. Mahamulkar
THE SECRETARY THE CLOTH MARKET AND SHOPS LABOUR BOARD GREATER MUMBAI (FOR MUMBAI THANE RAIGAD)
Adv. B.S. Mahamulkar
JOINT LABOUR COMMISSIONER (MATHADI) MUMBAI
PRASHANT MARUTI GUNJAL
UMESH BABANRAO BATWAL
MANGESH CHAVAN
PRATAP DOKE
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA LABOUR INDUSTRIES AND ENERGY DEPARTMENT
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. I. CHAGLA , HON'BLE JUSTICE ADVAIT M. SETHNA
FRESH ADMISSION
FOR ADMISSION
FOR DIRECTION
FOR CIRCULATION
DUE ADMISSION - 1
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-11-2025 | FRESH ADMISSION |
| 17-04-2026 | FOR ADMISSION |
| 16-04-2026 | FOR DIRECTION |
| 16-06-2026 | FOR CIRCULATION |
| 29-04-2026 | DUE ADMISSION - 1 |
Orders
The Bombay High Court held that the Labour Minister's direction to the Board Secretary to pass the impugned order dated 26 September 2025 was improper and should not have been issued. The court stayed implementation of the order until the Labour Minister decides a pending representation from Respondents 4-7 (within six weeks), plus two additional weeks, while reserving all substantive rights of the parties for future proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Bombay High Court held that the Labour Minister's direction to the Board Secretary to pass the impugned order dated 26 September 2025 was improper and should not have been issued. The court stayed implementation of the order until the Labour Minister decides a pending representation from Respondents 4-7 (within six weeks), plus two additional weeks, while reserving all substantive rights of the parties for future proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts