Bhavana Jain vs Union of India — WP/988/2026
Case under Central Goods and Service Tax Act Section 74. Next hearing: 30th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM010531072024
e-Filing Number
19-10-2024
Filing Number
WP/30817/2024
Filing Date
21-Oct-2024
Registration No
WP/988/2026
Registration Date
20-Jan-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Suman Shyam , Hon'ble Justice Advait M. Sethna
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Suman Shyam , Hon'ble Justice Advait M. Sethna
Bench Type
Division
Category
INDIRECT TAXES ( 17 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS ( 99 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 11-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Bhavana Jain
Adv. UBR Legal
Respondent(s)
-
1.Union of India
-
2.State of Maharashtra
-
3.Joint Commissioner CGST and Central Excise, Raigad
-
4.Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise Raigad
-
5.Deputy Commissioner of CGST and Central GST, Raigad
Case History
-
30-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
30-Jun-2026
Fresh Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice Suman Shyam , Hon'ble Justice Advait M. Sethna
-
09-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Suman Shyam,hon'ble Justice Advait M. SethnaView PDF
Case Summary: WP/988/2026 - Bhavana Jain v. Union of India The Bombay High Court granted ad-interim relief to petitioner Bhavana Jain, an independent company director, finding a strong prima facie case that she does not fall within Section 122(1A) of the CGST Act, 2017. The Court directed that no coercive action shall be taken against her regarding the penalty in question until further orders. The case is adjourned to 30th June 2026, with respondents granted three weeks to file their reply. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Jun-2026
Fresh Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice Suman Shyam , Hon'ble Justice Advait M. Sethna
-
05-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
21-Oct-2024
Case filed
Registration No. WP/988/2026
Case Summary: WP/988/2026 - Bhavana Jain v. Union of India The Bombay High Court granted ad-interim relief to petitioner Bhavana Jain, an independent company director, finding a strong prima facie case that she does not fall within Section 122(1A) of the CGST Act, 2017. The Court directed that no coercive action shall be taken against her regarding the penalty in question until further orders. The case is adjourned to 30th June 2026, with respondents granted three weeks to file their reply. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts