SANJAY SHAMRAO BHOR vs PUNE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION PMC BUILDING — WP/14928/2024
Case under Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 Section na. Disposed: Contested--Partly Allowed on 08th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM010530562024
Filing Number
WP/30780/2024
Filing Date
21-10-2024
Registration No
WP/14928/2024
Registration Date
22-10-2024
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMIT BORKAR
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMIT BORKAR
Bench Type
Single
Category
LABOUR MATTERS SINGLE BENCH ( 65 )
Sub-Category
CASUAL DAILY WAGES ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
08th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Partly Allowed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SANJAY SHAMRAO BHOR
Adv. NITIN KULKARNI
Respondent(s)
PUNE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION PMC BUILDING
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMIT BORKAR
FOR CIRCULATION
Revoked
FOR CIRCULATION
FOR ADMISSION
FOR ADMISSION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-07-2025 | FOR CIRCULATION |
| 08-05-2026 | Revoked |
| 07-05-2026 | FOR CIRCULATION |
| 30-04-2026 | FOR ADMISSION |
| 16-04-2026 | FOR ADMISSION |
Orders
Case Summary: WP/14928/2024 - SANJAY SHAMRAO BHOR v. PUNE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION Court Decision: The High Court of Bombay partly allowed five consolidated writ petitions, quashing the Labour Court's judgment dated 30 May 2024. The court declared the petitioners' termination on 19 March 2011 was illegal because it violated a subsisting interim order dated 30 July 2010 from the Industrial Court. The court directed reinstatement within 12 weeks and 25% compensation of last wages for the termination period, excluding periods when petitioners worked elsewhere, while explicitly denying permanency or regularization. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: WP/14928/2024 - SANJAY SHAMRAO BHOR v. PUNE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION Court Decision: The High Court of Bombay partly allowed five consolidated writ petitions, quashing the Labour Court's judgment dated 30 May 2024. The court declared the petitioners' termination on 19 March 2011 was illegal because it violated a subsisting interim order dated 30 July 2010 from the Industrial Court. The court directed reinstatement within 12 weeks and 25% compensation of last wages for the termination period, excluding periods when petitioners worked elsewhere, while explicitly denying permanency or regularization. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts