CHETAN PANDURANG CHATTAR vs PUNE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION PMC BUILDING — WP/15169/2024

Case under Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 Section NA. Disposed: --Partly Allowed on 08th May 2026.

CNR: HCBM010530352024

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

WP/30767/2024

Filing Date

21-10-2024

Registration No

WP/15169/2024

Registration Date

24-10-2024

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMIT BORKAR

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMIT BORKAR

Bench Type

Single

Category

LABOUR MATTERS SINGLE BENCH ( 65 )

Sub-Category

CASUAL DAILY WAGES ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

08th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

--Partly Allowed

Acts & Sections

Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

CHETAN PANDURANG CHATTAR

Adv. NITIN KULKARNI

Respondent(s)

PUNE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION PMC BUILDING

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMIT BORKAR

10-07-2025

FOR CIRCULATION

08-05-2026

Revoked

07-05-2026

FOR CIRCULATION

30-04-2026

FOR ADMISSION

16-04-2026

FOR ADMISSION

Orders

08-05-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMIT BORKAR

Case Summary: WP/15169/2024 - Chetan Pandurang Chattar v. Pune Municipal Corporation Court Decision: The High Court of Bombay partly allowed the writ petition, quashing the Labour Court's judgment and declaring the petitioner's March 19, 2011 termination illegal. The court found the termination violated a binding interim order dated July 30, 2010, which required the employer to continue the petitioner until duly selected candidates joined. The court ordered reinstatement within twelve weeks and directed 25% lump-sum compensation (excluding periods of alternative employment) instead of full back wages, while denying permanent status and limiting continuity to retirement benefits only. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP/15169/2024 - Chetan Pandurang Chattar v. Pune Municipal Corporation Court Decision: The High Court of Bombay partly allowed the writ petition, quashing the Labour Court's judgment and declaring the petitioner's March 19, 2011 termination illegal. The court found the termination violated a binding interim order dated July 30, 2010, which required the employer to continue the petitioner until duly selected candidates joined. The court ordered reinstatement within twelve weeks and directed 25% lump-sum compensation (excluding periods of alternative employment) instead of full back wages, while denying permanent status and limiting continuity to retirement benefits only. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case