CHETAN PANDURANG CHATTAR vs PUNE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION PMC BUILDING — WP/15169/2024

Case under Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 Section NA. Disposed: --Partly Allowed on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM010530352024

Filing Number

WP/30767/2024

Filing Date

21-Oct-2024

Registration No

WP/15169/2024

Registration Date

24-Oct-2024

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar

Bench Type

Single

Category

LABOUR MATTERS SINGLE BENCH ( 65 )

Sub-Category

CASUAL DAILY WAGES ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--Partly Allowed

Last updated 13-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CHETAN PANDURANG CHATTAR

    Adv. NITIN KULKARNI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PUNE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION PMC BUILDING

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit BorkarView PDF

    Case Summary: WP/15169/2024 - Chetan Pandurang Chattar v. Pune Municipal Corporation Court Decision: The High Court of Bombay partly allowed the writ petition, quashing the Labour Court's judgment and declaring the petitioner's March 19, 2011 termination illegal. The court found the termination violated a binding interim order dated July 30, 2010, which required the employer to continue the petitioner until duly selected candidates joined. The court ordered reinstatement within twelve weeks and directed 25% lump-sum compensation (excluding periods of alternative employment) instead of full back wages, while denying permanent status and limiting continuity to retirement benefits only. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    Revoked

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar

  4. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit BorkarView PDF

  5. 07-May-2026

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar

  6. 30-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit BorkarView PDF

  7. 30-Apr-2026

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar

  8. 16-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit BorkarView PDF

  9. 16-Apr-2026

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar

  10. 10-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit BorkarView PDF

  11. 10-Apr-2026

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar

  12. 02-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit BorkarView PDF

  13. 02-Apr-2026

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar

  14. 13-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit BorkarView PDF

  15. 13-Mar-2026

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar

  16. 06-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit BorkarView PDF

  17. 06-Mar-2026

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar

  18. 06-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit BorkarView PDF

  19. 06-Feb-2026

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar

  20. 30-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit BorkarView PDF

  21. 23-Dec-2025

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav

  22. 14-Oct-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF

  23. 14-Oct-2025

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav

  24. 24-Jul-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF

  25. 24-Jul-2025

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav

  26. 10-Jul-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF

  27. 10-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  28. 21-Oct-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/15169/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP/15169/2024 - Chetan Pandurang Chattar v. Pune Municipal Corporation Court Decision: The High Court of Bombay partly allowed the writ petition, quashing the Labour Court's judgment and declaring the petitioner's March 19, 2011 termination illegal. The court found the termination violated a binding interim order dated July 30, 2010, which required the employer to continue the petitioner until duly selected candidates joined. The court ordered reinstatement within twelve weeks and directed 25% lump-sum compensation (excluding periods of alternative employment) instead of full back wages, while denying permanent status and limiting continuity to retirement benefits only. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case