CHETAN PANDURANG CHATTAR vs PUNE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION PMC BUILDING — WP/15169/2024
Case under Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 Section NA. Disposed: --Partly Allowed on 08th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM010530352024
Filing Number
WP/30767/2024
Filing Date
21-10-2024
Registration No
WP/15169/2024
Registration Date
24-10-2024
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMIT BORKAR
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMIT BORKAR
Bench Type
Single
Category
LABOUR MATTERS SINGLE BENCH ( 65 )
Sub-Category
CASUAL DAILY WAGES ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
08th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
--Partly Allowed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
CHETAN PANDURANG CHATTAR
Adv. NITIN KULKARNI
Respondent(s)
PUNE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION PMC BUILDING
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMIT BORKAR
FOR CIRCULATION
Revoked
FOR CIRCULATION
FOR ADMISSION
FOR ADMISSION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-07-2025 | FOR CIRCULATION |
| 08-05-2026 | Revoked |
| 07-05-2026 | FOR CIRCULATION |
| 30-04-2026 | FOR ADMISSION |
| 16-04-2026 | FOR ADMISSION |
Orders
Case Summary: WP/15169/2024 - Chetan Pandurang Chattar v. Pune Municipal Corporation Court Decision: The High Court of Bombay partly allowed the writ petition, quashing the Labour Court's judgment and declaring the petitioner's March 19, 2011 termination illegal. The court found the termination violated a binding interim order dated July 30, 2010, which required the employer to continue the petitioner until duly selected candidates joined. The court ordered reinstatement within twelve weeks and directed 25% lump-sum compensation (excluding periods of alternative employment) instead of full back wages, while denying permanent status and limiting continuity to retirement benefits only. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: WP/15169/2024 - Chetan Pandurang Chattar v. Pune Municipal Corporation Court Decision: The High Court of Bombay partly allowed the writ petition, quashing the Labour Court's judgment and declaring the petitioner's March 19, 2011 termination illegal. The court found the termination violated a binding interim order dated July 30, 2010, which required the employer to continue the petitioner until duly selected candidates joined. The court ordered reinstatement within twelve weeks and directed 25% lump-sum compensation (excluding periods of alternative employment) instead of full back wages, while denying permanent status and limiting continuity to retirement benefits only. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts