SMT. SUSHILABAI ATMARAM JADHAV vs SHRI. SHIVRAM DEVRAM PAGARE AND OTHERS — CAS/624/2014

Case under C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order). Disposed: --Disposed Off on 29th April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 30-Sep-2019

CNR: HCBM010529802013

Filing Number

CAS/36109/2013

Filing Date

26-Dec-2013

Registration No

CAS/624/2014

Registration Date

21-Apr-2014

Judge

Hon'ble Ms. Justice Gauri Godse

Coram

Hon'ble Ms. Justice Gauri Godse

Bench Type

Single

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

29-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

--Disposed Off

Last updated 25-May-2026

Acts & Sections

C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SMT. SUSHILABAI ATMARAM JADHAV

    Adv. Pravartak Pathak

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHRI. SHIVRAM DEVRAM PAGARE AND OTHERS

    Adv. CAS STAND ABATED AS AGAIST DECEASED R NO 3 VIDE,REG JUDL II ORDER DT 06/04/2018.,CAS STAND DISMISSED AS AGAINST UNSERVED R NO 1,2,4,& 5 VIDE REG JUDL II ORDER DT 06/04/2018. 1123

  2. 2.SHRI. JAYWANT DEORAM PAGARE

  3. 3.SHRI. PAVALA DEORAM PAGARE

  4. 4.SMT. RAHUBAI SAMBHAJI JADHAV

  5. 5.SMT. SHANTABAI KHANDU SALVE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 29-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Gauri GodseView PDF

    The Bombay High Court dismissed the second appeal filed by Smt. Sushilabai Atmaram Jadhav for non-prosecution, as the appellant's counsel stated he had no instructions to proceed with the case. Consequently, the civil application was also disposed of as infructuous. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 29-Apr-2026

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Gauri Godse

  4. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Gauri GodseView PDF

  5. 30-Sep-2019

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 06-Apr-2018
  7. 22-Feb-2018
  8. 04-May-2017

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Nitin JamdarView PDF

  9. 26-Dec-2013

    Case filed

    Registration No. CAS/624/2014

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court dismissed the second appeal filed by Smt. Sushilabai Atmaram Jadhav for non-prosecution, as the appellant's counsel stated he had no instructions to proceed with the case. Consequently, the civil application was also disposed of as infructuous. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case