PRAVIN BERA AND ANR vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — WP/5274/2025

Case under Constitution of India Section 226,227. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 06th May 2026.

CNR: HCBM010529132025

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

WP/20212/2025

Filing Date

07-10-2025

Registration No

WP/5274/2025

Registration Date

07-10-2025

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ASHWIN D. BHOBE

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ASHWIN D. BHOBE

Bench Type

Division

Category

CRIMINAL ( 9 )

Sub-Category

QUASHING OF FIR C.R., CHARGE SHEET OR PROSECUTION ( 26 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Decision Date

06th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226,227
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528
Prevention of Gambling Act (Maharashtra) Section 4,5
Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 Section 25(C)

Petitioner(s)

PRAVIN BERA AND ANR

Adv. SRK Legal

NIKUNJ BHARAT THAKKAR

Respondent(s)

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ASHWIN D. BHOBE

14-10-2025

FRESH ADMISSION

03-08-2026

DUE ADMISSION - 1

06-03-2026

FOR ADMISSION

26-02-2026

DUE ADMISSION - 1

05-02-2026

DUE ADMISSION - 1

Orders

06-05-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ASHWIN D. BHOBE

The Bombay High Court dismissed Criminal Writ Petition No. 5274 of 2025 as withdrawn. Petitioners Pravin Bera and Nikunj Bharat Thakkar sought to quash FIR No. 885 of 2018 registered at Waliv Police Station, but their counsel requested unconditional withdrawal, which the State did not oppose. The court granted the withdrawal request and dismissed the petition accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court dismissed Criminal Writ Petition No. 5274 of 2025 as withdrawn. Petitioners Pravin Bera and Nikunj Bharat Thakkar sought to quash FIR No. 885 of 2018 registered at Waliv Police Station, but their counsel requested unconditional withdrawal, which the State did not oppose. The court granted the withdrawal request and dismissed the petition accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case