RAGHUNATH SHIVRAM NAIKADE vs PATIL CONSTRUCTION AND INFRACTRUCTURE LTD. Advocate - SHUBHAM S BAND — WP/382/2025

Case under Industrial Dispute Act, 1947. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM010524592024

Filing Number

WP/30433/2024

Filing Date

18-Oct-2024

Registration No

WP/382/2025

Registration Date

08-Jan-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar

Bench Type

Single

Category

LABOUR MATTERS DB ( 19 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS ( 99 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 28-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Industrial Dispute Act, 1947

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAGHUNATH SHIVRAM NAIKADE

    Adv. V N Jadhav

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PATIL CONSTRUCTION AND INFRACTRUCTURE LTD. Advocate - SHUBHAM S BAND

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit BorkarView PDF

    Case Summary: WP/382/2025 The High Court of Bombay enhanced compensation in an unlawful termination case, increasing the award from Rs.2,00,000 to Rs.8,00,000. Raghunath Naikade, a Senior Liaising Officer earning Rs.25,000/month, was orally terminated without due process on July 24, 2017, after 11 months of employment. The court found his termination unlawful, noting the employer failed to present rebuttal evidence despite Naikade's unchallenged testimony that he remained unemployed for 48 months. The court held the original compensation inadequate given admitted wages and prolonged unemployment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit BorkarView PDF

  4. 07-May-2026

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar

  5. 30-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit BorkarView PDF

  6. 30-Apr-2026

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar

  7. 23-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit BorkarView PDF

  8. 23-Apr-2026

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar

  9. 16-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit BorkarView PDF

  10. 16-Apr-2026

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar

  11. 02-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit BorkarView PDF

  12. 02-Apr-2026

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar

  13. 12-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit BorkarView PDF

  14. 12-Mar-2026

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar

  15. 05-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit BorkarView PDF

  16. 05-Mar-2026

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar

  17. 20-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit BorkarView PDF

  18. 20-Feb-2026

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar

  19. 13-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit BorkarView PDF

  20. 25-Nov-2025

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav

  21. 06-Oct-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF

  22. 06-Oct-2025

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav

  23. 17-Sep-2025

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav

  24. 15-Sep-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF

  25. 03-Sep-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF

  26. 03-Sep-2025

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav

  27. 09-Dec-2024

    Shri H.m.bhosale, Registrar(Judl I)View PDF

  28. 09-Dec-2024

    For Orders (Objection Not Removed)

    Shri H.m.bhosale, Registrar(Judl I)

  29. 22-Nov-2024

    Shri H.m.bhosale, Registrar(Judl I)View PDF

  30. 23-Oct-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  31. 18-Oct-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/382/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP/382/2025 The High Court of Bombay enhanced compensation in an unlawful termination case, increasing the award from Rs.2,00,000 to Rs.8,00,000. Raghunath Naikade, a Senior Liaising Officer earning Rs.25,000/month, was orally terminated without due process on July 24, 2017, after 11 months of employment. The court found his termination unlawful, noting the employer failed to present rebuttal evidence despite Naikade's unchallenged testimony that he remained unemployed for 48 months. The court held the original compensation inadequate given admitted wages and prolonged unemployment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case