RAGHUNATH SHIVRAM NAIKADE vs PATIL CONSTRUCTION AND INFRACTRUCTURE LTD. Advocate - SHUBHAM S BAND — WP/382/2025
Case under Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 Section ---. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 08th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM010524592024
Filing Number
WP/30433/2024
Filing Date
18-10-2024
Registration No
WP/382/2025
Registration Date
08-01-2025
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMIT BORKAR
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMIT BORKAR
Bench Type
Single
Category
LABOUR MATTERS DB ( 19 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS ( 99 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
08th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RAGHUNATH SHIVRAM NAIKADE
Adv. V N Jadhav
Respondent(s)
PATIL CONSTRUCTION AND INFRACTRUCTURE LTD. Advocate - SHUBHAM S BAND
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMIT BORKAR
FOR ORDERS (OBJECTION NOT REMOVED)
OBJECTIONS TO BE REMOVED
FOR CIRCULATION
FOR ADMISSION
FOR ADMISSION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-12-2024 | FOR ORDERS (OBJECTION NOT REMOVED) |
| 23-10-2024 | OBJECTIONS TO BE REMOVED |
| 03-09-2025 | FOR CIRCULATION |
| 07-05-2026 | FOR ADMISSION |
| 30-04-2026 | FOR ADMISSION |
Orders
Case Summary: WP/382/2025 The High Court of Bombay enhanced compensation in an unlawful termination case, increasing the award from Rs.2,00,000 to Rs.8,00,000. Raghunath Naikade, a Senior Liaising Officer earning Rs.25,000/month, was orally terminated without due process on July 24, 2017, after 11 months of employment. The court found his termination unlawful, noting the employer failed to present rebuttal evidence despite Naikade's unchallenged testimony that he remained unemployed for 48 months. The court held the original compensation inadequate given admitted wages and prolonged unemployment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: WP/382/2025 The High Court of Bombay enhanced compensation in an unlawful termination case, increasing the award from Rs.2,00,000 to Rs.8,00,000. Raghunath Naikade, a Senior Liaising Officer earning Rs.25,000/month, was orally terminated without due process on July 24, 2017, after 11 months of employment. The court found his termination unlawful, noting the employer failed to present rebuttal evidence despite Naikade's unchallenged testimony that he remained unemployed for 48 months. The court held the original compensation inadequate given admitted wages and prolonged unemployment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts