ANUJ RAKESH BHARADWAJ vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR — HCBM10524562025
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 07th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM010524562025
Next Hearing
07th May 2026
Filing Number
IA/20014/2025
Filing Date
03-10-2025
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ASHWIN D. BHOBE
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ASHWIN D. BHOBE
Bench Type
Division
Category
CRIMINAL ( 9 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS ( 99 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ANUJ RAKESH BHARADWAJ
Adv. SALMAN PATHAN
Respondent(s)
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ASHWIN D. BHOBE
FOR CIRCULATION
DUE ADMISSION - 1
DUE ADMISSION - 1
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-01-2026 | FOR CIRCULATION |
| 10-02-2026 | DUE ADMISSION - 1 |
| 01-09-2026 | DUE ADMISSION - 1 |
Orders
Summary The High Court of Bombay quashed FIR No. 398/2024 and related chargesheet in a matrimonial dispute case. The husband (Anuj Rakesh Bharadwaj) and his relatives filed writ petitions after the wife filed complaints under IPC Section 498A and SC/ST Act offences. After the parties amicably settled their matrimonial dispute and the wife filed an affidavit confirming no grievance remained, the Court allowed both petitions, quashing the FIR and chargesheet. Each petitioner was ordered to pay ₹25,000 costs within four weeks as a condition precedent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The High Court of Bombay quashed FIR No. 398/2024 and related chargesheet in a matrimonial dispute case. The husband (Anuj Rakesh Bharadwaj) and his relatives filed writ petitions after the wife filed complaints under IPC Section 498A and SC/ST Act offences. After the parties amicably settled their matrimonial dispute and the wife filed an affidavit confirming no grievance remained, the Court allowed both petitions, quashing the FIR and chargesheet. Each petitioner was ordered to pay ₹25,000 costs within four weeks as a condition precedent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts