SHIVAJI AMBADAS SHINDE vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — BA/3872/2025
Case under Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.pc) Section 439. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM010522412025
Filing Number
BA/19923/2025
Filing Date
01-Oct-2025
Registration No
BA/3872/2025
Registration Date
03-Oct-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. Joshi
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. Joshi
Bench Type
Single
Category
BAIL ( 51 )
Sub-Category
Regular ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Last updated 25-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHIVAJI AMBADAS SHINDE
Adv. ADITYA SINGH
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Case History
-
09-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
09-Jun-2026
For Admission (Bail Applications)
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. Joshi
-
04-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. JoshiView PDF
SUMMARY: Bail application allowed. Shivaji Ambadas Shinde's arrest for NDPS offences was deemed illegal because written grounds of arrest were not furnished, violating the mandatory requirement established in *Pankaj Bansal v. Union of India* (2024). He is released on bail upon furnishing a P.R. Bond of Rs. 50,000 with sureties, with conditions to attend police station monthly and all trial hearings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-May-2026
For Admission (Bail Applications)
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. Joshi
-
22-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. JoshiView PDF
-
22-Apr-2026
For Circulation -1
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. Joshi
-
15-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. JoshiView PDF
-
27-Mar-2026
For Admission (Bail Applications)
Hon'ble Justice Dr. Neela Kedar Gokhale
-
03-Feb-2026
Revoked
Hon'ble Justice Dr. Neela Kedar Gokhale
-
07-Jan-2026
Hon'ble Justice Dr. Neela Kedar GokhaleView PDF
-
10-Oct-2025
Hon'ble Justice Dr. Neela Kedar GokhaleView PDF
-
10-Oct-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-Oct-2025
Case filed
Registration No. BA/3872/2025
SUMMARY: Bail application allowed. Shivaji Ambadas Shinde's arrest for NDPS offences was deemed illegal because written grounds of arrest were not furnished, violating the mandatory requirement established in *Pankaj Bansal v. Union of India* (2024). He is released on bail upon furnishing a P.R. Bond of Rs. 50,000 with sureties, with conditions to attend police station monthly and all trial hearings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts