RAMESH CHUNILAL SIROHIYA vs VARADARAM KANAJI DEVASI AND ANR — APEAL/1390/2018

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 23-Oct-2018

CNR: HCBM010521392018

Filing Number

APEAL/1367/2018

Filing Date

31-Oct-2018

Registration No

APEAL/1390/2018

Registration Date

13-Nov-2018

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Shivkumar Dige

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Shivkumar Dige

Bench Type

Single

Category

CRIMINAL ( 9 )

Sub-Category

AGAINST ORDER OF ACQUITTAL ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 13-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAMESH CHUNILAL SIROHIYA

    Adv. Dnyaneshwar G. Adsul

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.VARADARAM KANAJI DEVASI AND ANR

  2. 2.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Shivkumar DigeView PDF

    The High Court of Bombay allowed appellant Ramesh Chunilal Sirohiya's request to withdraw his criminal appeal with liberty to file a fresh appeal before the Sessions Court, following the Supreme Court's precedent in Celestium Financial v. Ghanasekaran. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn, and the Sessions Court was directed to consider any delay in filing the subsequent appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 31-Oct-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. APEAL/1390/2018

  4. 23-Oct-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 23-Oct-2018

    Notification

    Hon'ble Shri Justice A.M. Badar

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay allowed appellant Ramesh Chunilal Sirohiya's request to withdraw his criminal appeal with liberty to file a fresh appeal before the Sessions Court, following the Supreme Court's precedent in Celestium Financial v. Ghanasekaran. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn, and the Sessions Court was directed to consider any delay in filing the subsequent appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case