BHUJANGRAO TUKARAM OGALE AND ORS. vs SUB- REGISTRAR , CLASS I AND ORS. — WP/10879/2018

Case under Bombay Stamps Act, 1958. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 30-Aug-2018

CNR: HCBM010521382017

Filing Number

WP/33908/2017

Filing Date

05-Dec-2017

Registration No

WP/10879/2018

Registration Date

25-Sep-2018

Judge

Hon'ble Ms. Justice Gauri Godse

Coram

Hon'ble Ms. Justice Gauri Godse

Bench Type

Single

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 13-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bombay Stamps Act, 1958

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BHUJANGRAO TUKARAM OGALE AND ORS.

    Adv. P D JADHAV

  2. 2.SHRI. RANGNATH RAM WALKE

  3. 3.SHRI. ROHIT DHANANJAY KAMLAKAR

  4. 4.SHRI. PRASHANT DATTATRAYA OGALE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SUB- REGISTRAR , CLASS I AND ORS.

  2. 2.JOINT DIST. REGISTRAR, CLASS-I

  3. 3.DY. INSPECTOR GENERAL OF REGISTRATION AND DY. CONTROLLER OF STAMPS,

  4. 4.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Gauri GodseView PDF

    Summary The Bombay High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging stamp duty demands on a property registration. The court upheld authorities' findings that the land fell within MIDC (Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation) notification limits under the 1961 Act, rejecting petitioners' claim it was agricultural land, and confirmed higher stamp duty was payable based on industrial land valuation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Gauri Godse

  4. 24-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Gauri GodseView PDF

  5. 24-Apr-2026

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Gauri Godse

  6. 10-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Gauri GodseView PDF

  7. 04-Nov-2020

    Fresh Admission

    According To Sitting List

  8. 30-Aug-2018

    Registrar (Judicial - Iwp)View PDF

  9. 30-Aug-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 05-Dec-2017

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/10879/2018

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Bombay High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging stamp duty demands on a property registration. The court upheld authorities' findings that the land fell within MIDC (Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation) notification limits under the 1961 Act, rejecting petitioners' claim it was agricultural land, and confirmed higher stamp duty was payable based on industrial land valuation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case