BHUJANGRAO TUKARAM OGALE AND ORS. vs SUB- REGISTRAR , CLASS I AND ORS. — WP/10879/2018

Case under Bombay Stamps Act, 1958. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 08th May 2026.

CNR: HCBM010521382017

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

30th August 2018

Filing Number

WP/33908/2017

Filing Date

05-12-2017

Registration No

WP/10879/2018

Registration Date

25-09-2018

Judge

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GAURI GODSE

Coram

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GAURI GODSE

Bench Type

Single

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

08th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Acts & Sections

Bombay Stamps Act, 1958

Petitioner(s)

BHUJANGRAO TUKARAM OGALE AND ORS.

Adv. P D JADHAV

SHRI. RANGNATH RAM WALKE

SHRI. ROHIT DHANANJAY KAMLAKAR

SHRI. PRASHANT DATTATRAYA OGALE

Respondent(s)

SUB- REGISTRAR , CLASS I AND ORS.

JOINT DIST. REGISTRAR, CLASS-I

DY. INSPECTOR GENERAL OF REGISTRATION AND DY. CONTROLLER OF STAMPS,

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GAURI GODSE

30-08-2018

FOR ORDERS (OFFICE OBJECTIONS)

08-05-2026

FOR ADMISSION

24-04-2026

FOR ADMISSION

04-11-2020

FRESH ADMISSION

Orders

08-05-2026
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GAURI GODSE

Summary The Bombay High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging stamp duty demands on a property registration. The court upheld authorities' findings that the land fell within MIDC (Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation) notification limits under the 1961 Act, rejecting petitioners' claim it was agricultural land, and confirmed higher stamp duty was payable based on industrial land valuation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Bombay High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging stamp duty demands on a property registration. The court upheld authorities' findings that the land fell within MIDC (Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation) notification limits under the 1961 Act, rejecting petitioners' claim it was agricultural land, and confirmed higher stamp duty was payable based on industrial land valuation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case