HANSAKUMARI RAJKUMAR CHHABRIA BEING THE LEGAL HEIR AND REPRESENTATIVE vs JYOTI SURESH PATEL AND ORS. — WP/2594/2018
Case under Rent Act. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 05th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM010517672017
Filing Number
WP/33689/2017
Filing Date
02-Dec-2017
Registration No
WP/2594/2018
Registration Date
27-Feb-2018
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne
Bench Type
Single
Category
RENT ACT ( 34 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
05-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 13-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.HANSAKUMARI RAJKUMAR CHHABRIA BEING THE LEGAL HEIR AND REPRESENTATIVE
Adv. FZB and ASSOCIATES
Respondent(s)
-
1.JYOTI SURESH PATEL AND ORS.
-
2.SURESH HRABHAI PATEL
-
3.VIVAN SURESH PATEL
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
05-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. MarneView PDF
In WP 2594/2018, the Bombay High Court disposed of the writ petition and related civil revision application after the parties reached an amicable settlement. Per the signed consent terms, Hansakumari Rajkumar Chhabria (the petitioner and legal heir) received possession of the suit premises and a demand draft payment from the respondents, with all parties accepting the settlement as an undertaking to the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Jan-2024
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajesh S. PatilView PDF
-
24-Jan-2024
For Direction
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajesh S. Patil
-
22-Jan-2024
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajesh S. PatilView PDF
-
08-Dec-2022
For Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice Nitin W. Sambre
-
16-Nov-2022
Hon'ble Shri Justice Nitin W. SambreView PDF
-
16-Sep-2020
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Dec-2017
Case filed
Registration No. WP/2594/2018
In WP 2594/2018, the Bombay High Court disposed of the writ petition and related civil revision application after the parties reached an amicable settlement. Per the signed consent terms, Hansakumari Rajkumar Chhabria (the petitioner and legal heir) received possession of the suit premises and a demand draft payment from the respondents, with all parties accepting the settlement as an undertaking to the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts