THE NEW INDIA ASSURNACE COMPANY LIMITED THANE DIVISIONAL OFFICE vs SMT.SEETA BALASAHEB ADSUL AND ORS. — CAF/1499/2018
Case under Motor Vehicles Act,1939. Disposed: --Disposed Off on 27th April 2018.
CNR: HCBM010517262017
Filing Number
CAF/33662/2017
Filing Date
29-Nov-2017
Registration No
CAF/1499/2018
Registration Date
06-Apr-2018
Judge
Hon'ble Smt. Justice Dr. Shalini Phansalkar-Joshi
Coram
Hon'ble Smt. Justice Dr. Shalini Phansalkar-Joshi
Bench Type
Single
Category
COMPENSATION ( 7 )
Sub-Category
INSURER LIABILITY MATTERS ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
27-Apr-2018
Nature of Disposal
--Disposed Off
Last updated 13-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE NEW INDIA ASSURNACE COMPANY LIMITED THANE DIVISIONAL OFFICE
Adv. Milind Vasant More
Respondent(s)
-
1.SMT.SEETA BALASAHEB ADSUL AND ORS.
-
2.KUMARI ANITA BALASAHEB ADSUL
-
3.MASTER SANTOSH BALASAHEB ADSUL
-
4.KUMARI ASHWINI BALSASHEB ADSUL
-
5.SHRI. AKRAM TAYEBALLI SHAIKH
-
6.MR. BHARAT AMRUTA @ AMRUT SHIROLE-DRIVER OF TRUCK NO.MH-43-E-5606
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
05-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal JainView PDF
Summary of CAF/1499/2018 The Bombay High Court allowed New India Assurance Company's applications in this insurance dispute case. The court condoned a 180-day delay in filing the appeal, stayed the lower court's order of December 29, 2016 after accepting the insurance company's statement that it had deposited the decretal amount, and permitted service of notice through newspaper publication after direct service attempts on respondents failed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
27-Apr-2018
Hon'ble Smt. Justice Dr. Shalini Phansalkar-JoshiView PDF
-
27-Apr-2018
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Apr-2018
For Production
Hon'ble Smt. Justice Dr. Shalini Phansalkar-Joshi
-
29-Nov-2017
Case filed
Registration No. CAF/1499/2018
Summary of CAF/1499/2018 The Bombay High Court allowed New India Assurance Company's applications in this insurance dispute case. The court condoned a 180-day delay in filing the appeal, stayed the lower court's order of December 29, 2016 after accepting the insurance company's statement that it had deposited the decretal amount, and permitted service of notice through newspaper publication after direct service attempts on respondents failed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts