SUMEET RAJARAM KADAM vs M/S SULZER PUMPS INDIA PVT. LTD — WP/12908/2025

Case under M.r.t.u. & P.u.l.p. Act Section NA. Disposed: --Disposed Off on 26th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM010514182025

Filing Number

WP/32316/2025

Filing Date

29-Sep-2025

Registration No

WP/12908/2025

Registration Date

03-Oct-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar

Bench Type

Single

Category

LABOUR MATTERS SINGLE BENCH ( 65 )

Sub-Category

DISMISSAL/TERMINATION ( 5 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

26-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--Disposed Off

Last updated 20-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

M.r.t.u. & P.u.l.p. Act Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUMEET RAJARAM KADAM

    Adv. THOMBARE GHANASHYAM RAGHUNATH

  2. 2.KAILAS MOHAN GURAV

  3. 3.ASHVDEEP HARI BHALERAO

  4. 4.GANESH DASHRATH DOHALE

  5. 5.NARESH PADMAKER RASAL

  6. 6.SOPAN RAJARAM CHAUDHARI

  7. 7.MAHESHWAR DINKAR KOCHAREKAR

  8. 8.NITIN VILAS WAIDHANDE

  9. 9.VINOD SUBHASH KURADE

  10. 10.SANKET MAHENDRA GADE

  11. 11.VAIBHAV MANOHAR GURAV

  12. 12.SUNIL SHANKAR GHANEKAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.M/S SULZER PUMPS INDIA PVT. LTD

  2. 2.UPPAL GURULAL VP-IR ADMIN CSR, M/S SULZER PUMPS INDIA PVT. LTD

  3. 3.AMIT KUMAR SIROHI

  4. 4.RAHUL SATOSKAR

  5. 5.MARUTI NANDAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 26-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit BorkarView PDF

    Summary The Bombay High Court partly allowed writ petitions challenging an Industrial Court's June 2025 order on unfair labour practices. The court upheld the Industrial Court's finding that Sulzer Pumps India engaged in unfair labour practices and confirmed permanency with back wages for complainants 7-12, but quashed relief granted to complainants 1-6 (placed on waiting list), holding the court lacked jurisdiction over termination disputes which fall exclusively under the Labour Court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit BorkarView PDF

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar

  5. 26-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit BorkarView PDF

  6. 26-Feb-2026

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar

  7. 20-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit BorkarView PDF

  8. 20-Feb-2026

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar

  9. 06-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit BorkarView PDF

  10. 06-Feb-2026

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar

  11. 30-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit BorkarView PDF

  12. 08-Jan-2026

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale

  13. 18-Dec-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish PitaleView PDF

  14. 11-Dec-2025

    High On Board (Hob)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale

  15. 20-Nov-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish PitaleView PDF

  16. 20-Nov-2025

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale

  17. 13-Nov-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish PitaleView PDF

  18. 13-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  19. 06-Oct-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF

  20. 29-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/12908/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Bombay High Court partly allowed writ petitions challenging an Industrial Court's June 2025 order on unfair labour practices. The court upheld the Industrial Court's finding that Sulzer Pumps India engaged in unfair labour practices and confirmed permanency with back wages for complainants 7-12, but quashed relief granted to complainants 1-6 (placed on waiting list), holding the court lacked jurisdiction over termination disputes which fall exclusively under the Labour Court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case